Hordini wrote:
Ahtman wrote:I would imagine that most people wouldn't want deranged NRA members shooting at their kids, but then I would think most people wouldn't want deranged people who aren't members of the NRA to shoot at their kids either. Come to think of it I doubt they would want anyone shooting at their kids regardless of lobby membership or mental state.
"He seemed calm, and he wasn't a member of the NRA, so I was ok with the killing spree at the playground."
You know, that's what I would think too. I certainly wouldn't want a deranged person shooting at anybody. That's why I'm not sure why the writer thought Yit was important enough to specifically mention NRA and GOA members, as if members of those groups are more likely to be deranged and start shooting people.
It seems like an old tactic. Give whoever oposes you undesirable traits and try to imprint that image on those you are trying to win to your side. Suppose I wanted to get alcohol banned because of all the traffic fatalities it causes when people drive drunk, but the Daily
KOS and its readers
are for defending people's right to drink.
I start writing about how I don't want my children killed by an alcoholic
KOS reader ala the Carrolton bus crash
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrollton,_Kentucky_bus_collision
I tie the concepts together, protect the children, and anyone who supports the right to drink is an alcoholic or deranged.
Keep repeating the lie long enough and people believe it.