H.B.M.C. wrote:Does it have six barrels where individual grenades protrude from each of those barrels like it was some sort of cylinder in a revolver despite also having a belt?
I mean, we're talking about the same company who made the pump-action cylinder-fed bolt "shotguns". They know nothing of how weapons function, and the Primaris Compensators and their Goofy Guns are the latest example, and a particularly egregious one.
See, HBMC, now you got me thinking!
The Mk. 32GL is an incredibly fun weapon system. It's a 6-chambered 40mm grenade launcher that can unload all 6 rounds in about 3 seconds. It reloads via breakdown, so reloading is obviously limited by the gunner.
BUT! It sure would be a lot more efficient if you could design a system that fed the rounds directly into the chamber via a belt drive. I wonder what that would even look like, and could you get it to function?
At any rate, I feel like it may come across that I'm defending
GW's design decisions, but that's not really my intent. I'm simply musing on possible similarities between real-world weapon systems and their fantasy-in-space equivalents. For more coolness points, I think it would've been better for the marine in question to not have a belt and instead have bandoliers of rockets like a modern Mk. 32 gunner does. At least then you could turn them into true rocket-firing desperados.