Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 07:07:11
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Frenzied Juggernaut
|
For example, i bike guy has the TL bolters on his bike, and a melta on one hand, can he shoot both at the same time in the shooting phase?
yay post number 666
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/02/24 07:07:36
qwekel wants to get bigger, please click on him and level him up.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 07:10:13
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
a bike can shoot one weapon for each rider displayed on the bike, meaning most can fire 1 a turn, while attack bikes may fire 2 a turn.
|
Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).
-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 07:12:17
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Frenzied Juggernaut
|
ahh i see, so they guy chooses whether to shoot his melta or his TL bolters on the bike. thanks for that.
Yes im aware of the attack bike, thank you, just asking about the bike.
|
qwekel wants to get bigger, please click on him and level him up.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 08:01:07
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
But if you model another rider on the bike than it can shoot both
I don't advocate such blatant "modeling for advantage" but I just think that the RAW here is silly.
|
Why did the berzerker cross the road?
Gwar! wrote:Willydstyle has it correct
Gwar! wrote:Yup you're absolutely right
New to the game and can't win? Read this.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 10:27:27
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout
|
Always watch out for the siamese bike marines.
I agree that it's a silly rule.
|
In one game turn an Imperial guardsman can move 6", kill a few guys with his flamer, assault 6", kill two more guys with his bayonet, flee 12", regroup when assaulted, react 6", kill one more guy with his bayonet and then flee another 12".
So in one game turn an Imperial guardsman can move 42" and kill more than 5 people. At the same time a Chimera at top speed on a road can move 18"... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 11:11:14
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
Rather than a rule in the BRB it should have been a part of the marine codex as an exception specifically for attack bikes. But whatever, they make the rulez.
|
Why did the berzerker cross the road?
Gwar! wrote:Willydstyle has it correct
Gwar! wrote:Yup you're absolutely right
New to the game and can't win? Read this.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 13:20:45
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Proud Phantom Titan
|
... I don't like the bikes may fire as many weapons as there are people ... as it lets you for example
SM Captain + stormbolter +Combie melta + bike and then model on 2 more space marines ... yes you may now shoot the TL bolter, the storm bolter and the combi-bolter ...
or
SM Chapter Master +stormbolter+combi-melta+ Auxiliary grenade launcher + bike
and then model on 3 SM ... then you can fire all weapons and call in an Orbital bombardment ...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 13:56:50
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
No people, you can't.
There is a rule that you shoot one per rider, there is no rule that lets you add riders.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 15:35:52
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
coredump wrote:No people, you can't.
There is a rule that you shoot one per rider, there is no rule that lets you add riders.
But it's never specified that attack bikes have 2 riders while normal bikes have one, The only demonstration of this fact that we have is that the models are this way. So whos to say you couldn't have two riders on a standard attack bike, I know the rules are meant to explicitly say things for you to be able to do them, but my point is they never explicitly say attack bikes have 2 riders, it's just most people model them that way.
|
Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).
-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 15:46:48
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Drunkspleen wrote:So whos to say you couldn't have two riders on a standard attack bike, I know the rules are meant to explicitly say things for you to be able to do them, but my point is they never explicitly say attack bikes have 2 riders, it's just most people model them that way.
GW's rules are permissive. You need to find something that says you CAN model more than one rider on a bike. An IC can purchase a bike from his options. Where does it say that it's a bike and a chauffeur?
And I belive that the fact that GW's model for the Attack Bike has two riders is quite explicit.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 16:13:44
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Proud Phantom Titan
|
But you are aloud to scratch build if there is no GW model availible ... In fact you could get really weird and model a Farseer on to a Viper and call it a jetbike...why? well he can now use two shotting attacks per turn But all of this is just a piss take and no one would try it (well TFG would but i have a hard back rule book for that very reason)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/02/24 16:14:05
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 16:27:24
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
And there is a GW model available for the Attack Bike. There's still no option to take a bike and a chauffeur and a Vyper is not a jetbike.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 17:04:57
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
I would let an opponent field a well converted bike with two riders. Just as long as it was fielded as an attack bike.
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 17:15:29
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
The Hammer of Witches
A new day, a new time zone.
|
My SM Bike captain model has two models on it. They still only fire one gun ( the only gun it's equipped with are the bike bolters).
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/02/24 17:16:02
"-Nonsense, the Inquisitor and his retinue are our hounoured guests, of course we should invite them to celebrate Four-armed Emperor-day with us..." Thought for the Day - Never use the powerfist hand to wipe. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 20:18:39
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Waaagh! Warbiker
|
Well a Space Marine Captain has no Model, you have to convert it.
if I convert a SM on bike with 3 riders on it can I fire 3 weapons? It never says either way how many riders are on a bike.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/24 22:56:01
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Waaaaaaagh! wrote:Well a Space Marine Captain has no Model, you have to convert it.
if I convert a SM on bike with 3 riders on it can I fire 3 weapons? It never says either way how many riders are on a bike.
No. You're equipping the Captain with a Space Marine bike. The description under 'other equipment' in the marine codex clearly explains what this includes, and an additional rider is not included.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/25 02:54:25
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
Waaaaaaagh! wrote:Well a Space Marine Captain has no Model, you have to convert it.
if I convert a SM on bike with 3 riders on it can I fire 3 weapons? It never says either way how many riders are on a bike.
There are some things that clearly go against the intent of the rules. This is one of them.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/02/25 02:55:22
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/25 03:46:19
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Waaagh! Warbiker
|
Well for me its not "clearly against the intent".
Show me a passage in the rulebook to support your case, as has been shown to support my case.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/25 03:49:17
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Stubborn Temple Guard
|
willydstyle wrote:But if you model another rider on the bike than it can shoot both
I don't advocate such blatant "modeling for advantage" but I just think that the RAW here is silly.
Nob Bikers are even more unfair! Just start modeling dozens of Grots on them!
|
27th Member of D.O.O.M.F.A.R.T.
Resident Battletech Guru. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/25 04:03:00
Subject: Re:About bikes
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Id say no friggin way. You wouldnt be paying for the EXTRA riders as far as points go. Thats cheating simply because your fielding more marines then you paid for. Attack bikes have 2 riders mainly because it has 2 wounds. Says so in the book.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/25 04:32:09
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Waaaaaaagh! wrote:Well for me its not "clearly against the intent".
Show me a passage in the rulebook to support your case, as has been shown to support my case.
You haven't supported your case, not by a long shot. You've not once shown where a Space Marine Captain gets as many extra Marines as he wants when all he buys is a bike. He purchased a bike, period.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/25 11:36:23
Subject: Re:About bikes
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Sure it might not specify that in the bikes section of the rule book(I dont have it in front of me) but clearly this is one of those look at the big picture things. You CANNOT have marines or any mini for that matter that you havnt paid for. Thats ever worse then people pulling the "oh thats why my force was so badass, I "forgot" to add the points for my force commanders wargear" at the end of a game. Putting marines on a bike just so you can fire everything youve paid for is cheating beyond cheating. I wouldnt care if you converted your bikes to look cool, just dont pull that crap its blatantly cheating. After the well theres 3 minis on that bike so everygun can be shot, your going to say well since they are there it has 3 wonds too
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/25 14:51:59
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Hooded Inquisitorial Interrogator
|
Waaaaaaagh! wrote:if I convert a SM on bike with 3 riders on it can I fire 3 weapons? It never says either way how many riders are on a bike.
And if you model him in a red and blue spandex suit will you claim that he can fly around the table, shoot lasers from his eyes an be vunerable only to models that are equiped with Kyronite? (good luck finding a codex with that as a weapon option).
In short no.
There is no rule allowing you to put extra guys on a bike, therefore you can't. Simply announcing you can make a model for something you make up is nothing more than declaring an intention to cheat, not a proof of possiblity.
|
If brute force doesn't work, you're not using enough... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/26 01:59:53
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
Hymirl wrote:Waaaaaaagh! wrote:if I convert a SM on bike with 3 riders on it can I fire 3 weapons? It never says either way how many riders are on a bike.
And if you model him in a red and blue spandex suit will you claim that he can fly around the table, shoot lasers from his eyes an be vunerable only to models that are equiped with Kyronite? (good luck finding a codex with that as a weapon option).
In short no.
There is no rule allowing you to put extra guys on a bike, therefore you can't. Simply announcing you can make a model for something you make up is nothing more than declaring an intention to cheat, not a proof of possiblity.
There is a rule allowing you to put extra guys on a bike it's the rule which almost everybody plays buy which says "you are allowed to convert". Your example is a terrible terrible straw man argument that I have seen you use in the exact same way before and it was just as poorly applied then.
There's no rule that says that "models shown wearing red and blue spandex suits gain the following bonuses:" there IS however a rule that says that a bike model shown to have 2 riders get to shoot an extra weapon.
|
Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).
-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/26 02:43:45
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
And exactly where in the rulebook is this 'conversion' rule that allows you to add extra Marines to the Captain's bike? Page number and quote please. The only one here with the strawman argument is you, claiming a modelling rule allows you to claim an in-game advantage.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/26 02:48:51
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Waaagh! Warbiker
|
"claiming a modelling rule allows you to claim an in-game advantage. "
It sure does. I'm sure I'm not the only one to see a Nid Army converted so they are all hugging their bases like its going out of fashion.
If that's Allowed why wouldn't Adding Extra Riders be? The problem is here the BRB states, and I'll quote "Each bike in a unit may fire one weapon for each rider on the bike". The SM Codex doesn't say that each Bike only has 1 Rider, nor does it even say the Attack Bike has 2. Therefore, Bikes should never be able to fire!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/26 02:54:40
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Yes, you are one of the few who've seen somebody actually go to the time and expense to convert their models for a slight in-game advantage that usually ends up meaning the player has no opponents after a while.
Line of sight works on how the model is actually, physically modelled. That's an actual rule. How many riders it has is not. Claiming it is is a load of BS. That's the difference.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/26 03:57:58
Subject: Re:About bikes
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
This thread is a prime example of why I hate this forum.
C'mon people it's quite obvious that a bike has one rider. No matter how many models are on it, no matter the crazy stupid conversion you make. Unless it's an attack bike.
I don't need to show you any rules that point one way or another. It's just asinine.
It's not a RAW vs RAI argument, it's just some people being stupid.
Why aren't there any examples of battle reports or anywhere else of ANYONE saying "hey, a good tip is to model two people on a bike so you can shoot both weapons!"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/26 08:07:19
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Frenzied Juggernaut
|
Waaaaaaagh! wrote:"claiming a modelling rule allows you to claim an in-game advantage. "
It sure does. I'm sure I'm not the only one to see a Nid Army converted so they are all hugging their bases like its going out of fashion.
If that's Allowed why wouldn't Adding Extra Riders be? The problem is here the BRB states, and I'll quote "Each bike in a unit may fire one weapon for each rider on the bike". The SM Codex doesn't say that each Bike only has 1 Rider, nor does it even say the Attack Bike has 2. Therefore, Bikes should never be able to fire!
show me an actual instance in gaming where your opponent moded 2 guys on a NORMAL bike and claimed he can shoot both his weapons. can you name an example? if not, then there's no point for anyone to argue with you because all your talking about is BS and you're never gona do it without actually losing some opponents to play with.
|
qwekel wants to get bigger, please click on him and level him up.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/26 08:25:11
Subject: About bikes
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
If the ensuing bout of "taking the idea seriously" weren't so hilarious, I'd almost feel bad for suggesting modeling extra riders in the first place
|
Why did the berzerker cross the road?
Gwar! wrote:Willydstyle has it correct
Gwar! wrote:Yup you're absolutely right
New to the game and can't win? Read this.
|
|
 |
 |
|