Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 07:35:50
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
I don't know about y'all, but to me the ability to send someone to jail because they don't want to buy health insurance is totally ridiculous. Thoughts?
http://www.politico.com/livepulse/0909/Ensign_receives_handwritten_confirmation_.html?showall
|
DR:80+S(GT)G++M++B-I++Pwmhd05#+D+++A+++/sWD-R++T(Ot)DM+
How is it they live in such harmony - the billions of stars - when most men can barely go a minute without declaring war in their minds about someone they know.
- St. Thomas Aquinas
Warhammer 40K:
Alpha Legion - 15,000 pts For the Emperor!
WAAAGH! Skullhooka - 14,000 pts
Biel Tan Strikeforce - 11,000 pts
"The Eldar get no attention because the average male does not like confetti blasters, shimmer shields or sparkle lasers."
-Illeix |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 07:42:44
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Da Head Honcho Boss Grot
|
I agree.
I could see requiring that you provide it to a dependent or something like that, but I don't see the justification for forcing adults to buy it.
|
Anuvver fing - when they do sumfing, they try to make it look like somfink else to confuse everybody. When one of them wants to lord it over the uvvers, 'e says "I'm very speshul so'z you gotta worship me", or "I know summink wot you lot don't know, so yer better lissen good". Da funny fing is, arf of 'em believe it and da over arf don't, so 'e 'as to hit 'em all anyway or run fer it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 11:28:13
Subject: Re:Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
Just one more sign of the end of democracy. Heil Obama...
|
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!!!!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 11:40:54
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
Are you required by law to purchase car insurance? (If you drive a car, I mean.)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/09/26 11:41:51
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 11:54:20
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Lead-Footed Trukkboy Driver
|
What happens to someone without health insurance who needs medical care?
|
I refuse to enter a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 12:24:42
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
At the moment they get emergency care free.
The costs are absorbed by the various private and social insurance schemes and passed onto insured people and taxpayers.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 12:40:06
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Lead-Footed Trukkboy Driver
|
So people who do not want to buy health insurance are sponging off those that do, by not paying, but receiving care anyway?
Note: This is not an attack on people who cannot afford health care - that is a different question.
The OP was talking about those who do not want to buy it.
|
I refuse to enter a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 17:32:46
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
So people who do not want to buy health insurance are sponging off those that do, by not paying, but receiving care anyway?
Not really, because at the moment anyone who doesn’t have any health insurance can only get emergency treatment, unless they are poor enough to qualify for Medicaid.
The proposed fine is in the healthcare reform bill. The significance of this proposed fine is as follows:
Since it is said cases will be investigated and followed up by the Internal Revenue Service, this means the proposed healthcare charge is a form of tax.
Obama said taxes wouldn’t rise because of healthcare reform.
Cue right-wing fury.
It is taxation which pays for publicly provided healthcare insurance now. Privately insured citizens usually get their insurance from their employer, which depresses take-home salaries (effectively a tax equivalent) and means in some cases they get no choice.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/09/26 17:38:47
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 18:05:03
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
Murfreesboro, TN
|
Under that reasoning, EVERYTHING is a tax... which is right about up their alley of mental processes.
|
As a rule of thumb, the designers do not hide "easter eggs" in the rules. If clever reading is required to unlock some sort of hidden option, then it is most likely the result of wishful thinking.
But there's no sense crying over every mistake;
You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.
Member of the "No Retreat for Calgar" Club |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 18:10:58
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Da Head Honcho Boss Grot
|
Kilkrazy wrote:Are you required by law to purchase car insurance? (If you drive a car, I mean.)
Usually you need to have Liability Insurance, which doesn't cover your car, but does cover the car of a person you crash into.
I'm not sure if the requirement is made at the federal or state level.
|
Anuvver fing - when they do sumfing, they try to make it look like somfink else to confuse everybody. When one of them wants to lord it over the uvvers, 'e says "I'm very speshul so'z you gotta worship me", or "I know summink wot you lot don't know, so yer better lissen good". Da funny fing is, arf of 'em believe it and da over arf don't, so 'e 'as to hit 'em all anyway or run fer it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 18:13:35
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
(THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
|
That seems overharsh. That kind of measure should be reserved for multiple violations, not first time. It should also be rolled into another process (Like doing standard taxes) to relieve the burden on the thoughtless. I'm not terrible opposed to people having to have insurance, so long as the government insurance options truly are affordable at any level.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/09/26 18:17:06
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Do you remember that time that thing happened?
This is a bad thread and you should all feel bad |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 18:35:34
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Lead-Footed Trukkboy Driver
|
ShumaGorath wrote:That seems overharsh. That kind of measure should be reserved for multiple violations, not first time. It should also be rolled into another process (Like doing standard taxes) to relieve the burden on the thoughtless. I'm not terrible opposed to people having to have insurance, so long as the government insurance options truly are affordable at any level.
It is quite likely that jail sentences will be reserved for multiple-offences.
Violators could be charged with a misdemeanor and could face up to a year in jail or a $25,000 penalty
|
I refuse to enter a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 18:57:06
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Certain peoples don't need car insurance (and no I don't mean individuals but more a select few "groups"), at least not in state of Mn.
Yeah, if this actually passes I will be sorely tempted to leave the country. What a bunch of crap. Even if they give you 3 chances to buy health care coverage it's still crap that you could possibly face a prison sentence.
How about the government worries about the unemployment issue and jobless rate first, worries about healthcare second? I run out of unemployment next week with no job in sight.
Ah well, maybe once I lose my car and internet and have to live on ramen noodles and sell aluminum cans i pick up on the side of the road for rent money I'll be able to afford insurance.
I am so glad I did not vote for Obama Hussein (or should that be Saddam Jr?) LOL
|
--The whole concept of government granted and government regulated 'permits' and the accompanying government mandate for government approved firearms 'training' prior to being blessed by government with the privilege to carry arms in a government approved and regulated manner, flies directly in the face of the fundamental right to keep and bear arms.
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.”
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 19:43:51
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Kilkrazy wrote:At the moment they get emergency care free.
The costs are absorbed by the various private and social insurance schemes and passed onto insured people and taxpayers.
Do not forget Charities that help cover the costs as well. Automatically Appended Next Post: All I am saying is this :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/09/26 19:45:49
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 21:03:31
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
Orkeosaurus wrote:Kilkrazy wrote:Are you required by law to purchase car insurance? (If you drive a car, I mean.)
Usually you need to have Liability Insurance, which doesn't cover your car, but does cover the car of a person you crash into.
I'm not sure if the requirement is made at the federal or state level.
The state level, according to Wikipedia.
In essence, if you own a car, you are required by law to buy insurance so that when you crash into someone they can be compensated, or else you pay an annual tax instead, or in most cases you will be criminally prosecuted and fined or jailed for non-compliance.
The key difference between car insurance and the proposed mandatory government health insurance is that right wingers are against healthcare reform.
Labelling things as a tax or not is a red herring. What matters is how much of what you earn you are legally compelled to do something else with, and how much you can reserve and spend as you like.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 21:16:17
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Moustache-twirling Princeps
About to eat your Avatar...
|
Sounds like a pretty big mistake.
Not sure what else to add really. I have no problems with everyone being covered, and if I am not mistaken this would only be applied to a small segment of the population; i.e. if fateweaver is broke as a joke, then he will not be forced to by insurance. In fact he would be eligible for something like medi-caid, which sucks, but at least it is insurance.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 21:31:44
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Kilkrazy wrote:Are you required by law to purchase car insurance? (If you drive a car, I mean.)
We are at the state level. Each state has its own requirements for car insurance, but you are not prosecuted for not having it. The most you get is a ticket. I have never heard of any case that involves jail time because of no car insurance. I am not a fan of mandated insurance anyway though, it artificially drives up insurance costs because the companies know that you have to buy it.
BlackSpike wrote:What happens to someone without health insurance who needs medical care?
Many private and/or religious hospitals will provide medical care free of charge. They subsist on charitable donations and the like, and let me tell you, some of this hospitals are fething amazing. Check out the medical center in Houston, it has to be the world's greatest medical district. Other than that, emergency room care is always free, but whether or not it is an emergency is at the doctor's discretion in some places. Honestly though, the doctor should be able to decide in all places. I have seen people take their kids to the emergency room over a cough.
|
DR:80+S(GT)G++M++B-I++Pwmhd05#+D+++A+++/sWD-R++T(Ot)DM+
How is it they live in such harmony - the billions of stars - when most men can barely go a minute without declaring war in their minds about someone they know.
- St. Thomas Aquinas
Warhammer 40K:
Alpha Legion - 15,000 pts For the Emperor!
WAAAGH! Skullhooka - 14,000 pts
Biel Tan Strikeforce - 11,000 pts
"The Eldar get no attention because the average male does not like confetti blasters, shimmer shields or sparkle lasers."
-Illeix |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 21:46:54
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Da Head Honcho Boss Grot
|
Kilkrazy wrote:The key difference between car insurance and the proposed mandatory government health insurance is that right wingers are against healthcare reform.
That's hardly the only difference in play.
Liability insurance is mandated by the states, not the federal government, which means people have a greater degree of control concerning the how the law effects them.
Liability insurance is also only a requirement for driving a car on public roads. You don't have to pay it by default.
And the most significant difference is that liability insurance covers another person that you could potentially hurt. Forcing everyone to purchase health insurance is the equivalent of then forcing everyone to purchase full coverage for their car as well.
|
Anuvver fing - when they do sumfing, they try to make it look like somfink else to confuse everybody. When one of them wants to lord it over the uvvers, 'e says "I'm very speshul so'z you gotta worship me", or "I know summink wot you lot don't know, so yer better lissen good". Da funny fing is, arf of 'em believe it and da over arf don't, so 'e 'as to hit 'em all anyway or run fer it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 21:50:11
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
(THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
|
Many private and/or religious hospitals will provide medical care free of charge. They subsist on charitable donations and the like, and let me tell you, some of this hospitals are fething amazing. Check out the medical center in Houston, it has to be the world's greatest medical district. Other than that, emergency room care is always free, but whether or not it is an emergency is at the doctor's discretion in some places. Honestly though, the doctor should be able to decide in all places. I have seen people take their kids to the emergency room over a cough.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-06-18-texas-health-care_N.htm
What does a health crisis look like? See Houston
HOUSTON — Ijeoma Onye awoke one day last month short of breath, her head pounding. Her daughter, Ebere Hawkins, drove her 45 minutes from Katy, Texas, to Ben Taub General Hospital, where people without health insurance pay little or nothing for treatment.
Onye, 62, waited four hours to be seen. Still, going to the emergency room was faster than getting an appointment. For that, "you have to wait months," Hawkins says.
Ben Taub is the hub of the Harris County Hospital District, a network of hospitals and care centers serving the Houston area's 1.1 million uninsured residents and hundreds of thousands more with little coverage. Here, the national statistic of 45 million uninsured people is more than a number. It's a crisis.
Nationally, more than 15% are uninsured. In Texas it's nearly 24%, the Census Bureau says, the highest percentage among the states. Here in Harris County, it's 30%, according to state figures, the highest rate among the nation's top 10 metropolitan areas.
As the Houston area struggles to deal with a rising tide of uninsured, it offers a lesson for the nation: Let the problem get out of hand — to a point where nearly 1 in 3 people have no coverage — and you won't just have a less healthy population. You'll have an overwhelmed health care system.
"Texas is the case study for system implosion," says neurosurgeon Guy Clifton, founder of the Houston-area group Save Our ERs.
The problems here, as elsewhere, are many. Small employers are dropping health coverage. Federal and state subsidies don't make up the difference. Illegal immigrants represent 21% of the county's public caseload, even though they represent only about 6% of the area's population.
Compounding the problem, insurers are slashing hospitals' reimbursement rates, often leading the hospitals to reduce unprofitable services such as emergency rooms.
The huge number of uninsured residents here means that health officials must make tough decisions every day about who gets treated and when. "Does this mean rationing? You bet it does," says Kenneth Mattox, chief of staff at Ben Taub, the Houston area's pre-eminent trauma care facility.
Some states are trying to tackle the problem. The broadest solutions have been advanced in Massachusetts, Vermont and Maine. California, Illinois and Pennsylvania may not be far behind. Still more states are trying to insure all children as a first step toward insuring all residents. In most of those states, proposals range from increasing government subsidies to mandating that either employers offer or consumers buy coverage.
Then there's Texas, where the insurance crisis has multiple causes:
•Small businesses dominate the economy, but only 31% of those with 50 or fewer employees offer insurance in Texas, compared with 43% nationally. As a result, 48% of Texans are covered by employers, compared with 53% nationally.
•Income limits to qualify for Medicaid, the federal-state health insurance program for the poor and disabled, are among the lowest in the nation here. Texas has set a limit of $4,822 per year for a family of three, compared with nearly $10,000 in Florida, $18,000 in California and $25,000 in New York. Texas has no subsidized health insurance program for childless adults; 19 states and the District of Columbia offer some coverage.
•The state has forfeited more than $900 million in federal money under the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) during the past six years because it wouldn't put up 28 cents for each 72 cents in federal aid. Restrictions put in place in 2003 cut about 200,000 children from the program in a state with the highest percentage of uninsured children, nearly twice the national average. "It's a horrible scandal," says Jeffrey Starke, chief of pediatrics at Ben Taub.
State officials say the biggest problem in Texas is a surging population: about 23.5 million in 2006, up 12.7% from 2000, about twice the national growth rate. Texas' increase has continued to be fueled by immigrants who cross the nation's longest border with Mexico.
"We have tremendous population growth, and we have to try to keep up with that," says Nora Belcher, senior health adviser to Gov. Rick Perry.
The state's Medicaid program has doubled in cost in 10 years despite its low income limits, Belcher says. CHIP money was left on the table because the program started late and could not be fully funded during a 2003 budget shortfall.
"Others would call us cheap," she says. "We think we're prudent."
'This system is broken'
The growth of the nation's uninsured population has stretched hospital emergency departments to the breaking point.
Nationally, ER visits rose from 93 million to 110 million from 1994 to 2004, an 18% jump, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Texas experienced a 33% increase; in the Houston area, it was more than 50%, according to the Texas Hospital Association. The number of hospital emergency departments dropped by more than 12% in the USA in the same period.
Emergency rooms here are routinely overcrowded. "When I came in this morning, there were people waiting from yesterday," says Kellie Manger, a triage nurse at Ben Taub, on a recent weekday.
About half of the people going to emergency rooms here just need primary care, a percentage that's similar elsewhere. "We see lots of patients here who haven't seen a doctor in years," says Katherine King-Casas, an emergency room physician at Ben Taub.
Packed emergency rooms also are caused by overcrowded hospitals in general. At Ben Taub, Mattox gets calls from area business leaders and politicians seeking to "sneak in the back door a maid, a nanny." Doctors, frustrated by long delays for surgeries, try getting patients admitted to the hospital to move them ahead in line.
"Safety-net facilities were never designed to handle one-third of a population," says George Masi, Ben Taub's chief operating officer. "I don't think this is unique to Texas. Something's got to be done. This system is broken."
Crowding leads hospitals to send patients elsewhere.
In the Houston area, hospitals divert patients about 20% of the time, says Charles Begley of the University of Texas School of Public Health. Ambulances pile up outside emergency rooms, often waiting an hour or two to get their patients in for treatment. David Persse, the Houston Fire Department's medical director, says the area record is six hours. The situation is so bad that patients have called 911 from one ER to get to another.
Doctors here cite horror stories, such as the patient who died after being diverted by helicopter from a Houston hospital to one in Austin. "Diversion kills you," Clifton says.
Long waits, packed corridors
The greatest demand for health care isn't in emergency rooms. It's at the clinics and health centers designed to relieve them.
Maria Gutierrez came to Ben Taub's orthopedics clinic one day last month to have her ankle checked after surgery and to fill some prescriptions. The visit took 8½ hours. A week later she was back, in a corridor where as many as 350 people with specialty clinic appointments wait for hours. "Sometimes you don't want to be in the hospital all day," she says.
Bartolome Martinez arrived at the Strawberry Health Center in Pasadena, just outside Houston, at 4 one recent morning to be first in line for the few walk-in slots allotted. The 70-year-old native of Cuba waited outside until the center opened at 7:30 and was still waiting inside at 9 to have the pain in his side analyzed. Still, he says, that was better than waiting three months for an appointment.
Joyce Heifner, 54, discovered the San Jose Clinic, the nation's oldest charity care clinic, five years ago after struggling for about 15 years with the effects of polio she contracted as a child. The clinic, booked like all the others, is a 70-mile drive for her from Livingston, Texas, which has no public hospitals or clinics for the uninsured.
San Jose tries to fill the gap between primary and hospital care with its own specialists, but the wait can take months. "We have one rheumatologist who comes here," says Rosanne Popp, a primary care physician. "There's not an appointment until next year."
For the working poor, waiting for treatment means less time on the job. Angel Martinez, 20, broke his ankle last month and was taken to a private hospital, which put on a cast and billed him $4,500. "That's money that I don't have," he says. He had surgery at Ben Taub and is eager to get his stitches out so he can go back to work as a driver. "This is the foot I use for the gas and the brakes," he says.
The large numbers of uninsured and overburdened health care system have consequences: Studies done during the past 25 years indicate that being uninsured is hazardous to your health.
The uninsured are more likely to have high infant mortality rates. They are more likely to develop high blood pressure and hypertension. They are less likely to get treatment for trauma. They are less likely to receive timely cancer diagnoses. They are more likely to die from heart attacks.
'They die sooner'
Among the states, Texas has the highest percentage of uninsured adults — 27.6% — who say they are in poor or fair health, rather than good or excellent health, the American Hospital Association says.
Even when the uninsured see doctors, they often can't afford drugs. "You prescribe, you send them home, they don't get well," says Efrain Garcia, a cardiologist who volunteers at San Jose. "They die sooner. They have more complications. They are more disabled."
Cora Sylvester, 50, of La Porte, about 25 miles east of Houston, waited about a year after noticing a lump on her breast because she was poor, uninsured — and busy. Eventually she came to The Rose, a women's diagnostic center. She has since had chemotherapy, surgery and radiation, but her long-term prognosis is questionable.
"It's always an issue to not have any type of insurance," she says. "You feel like you just fell in a hole."
Faced with the onslaught of uninsured patients, Texas is taking steps to rework some of its policies.
Late last month, the Legislature changed its rules to add more than 127,000 children to the 300,000 now covered by the Children's Health Insurance Program. Asset tests were eased, enrollment periods extended and waiting periods eliminated for many clients. The Legislature also paved the way for a new program that will subsidize insurance for 200,000 adults.
'We make a little dent'
Still, there is nothing being proposed on the scale of Massachusetts' fledgling program to insure all residents. "There is not going to be a Massachusetts-mandate, one-size-fits-all solution for Texas. We're just too big," Belcher says. To do that here, says Camille Miller, president of the Texas Health Institute, would cost $6 billion.
In the meantime, Houston's health care system is doing what it can. The Harris County Hospital District is educating patients about when to use clinics, not emergency rooms. The Harris County health care Alliance is trying to develop less costly insurance products, especially for small employers.
"Gateway to Care" navigators help uninsured people find primary or specialty care at area clinics. "We're touching thousands of people, but there are a million people without insurance," says Sandy Steigerwald, patient care coordination manager for Gateway to Care.
An "Ask Your Nurse" program offers phone advice to ease the burden on emergency rooms. "We make a little dent," says the nursing program's Titiana Grossley-Brown.
For all their efforts, Houston-area health officials have been unable to reduce the numbers of uninsured.
"Our problems are horrible and embarrassing, but everybody's aware of them," Begley says. "What we're struggling with is what can we do about them."
|
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Do you remember that time that thing happened?
This is a bad thread and you should all feel bad |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 22:04:16
Subject: Re:Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Moustache-twirling Princeps
About to eat your Avatar...
|
Oops... guess that tanked a bit...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/26 23:36:32
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
Orkeosaurus wrote:Kilkrazy wrote:The key difference between car insurance and the proposed mandatory government health insurance is that right wingers are against healthcare reform.
That's hardly the only difference in play.
...
...
.
I said "key", not "only".
We are discussing the reaction to the original report, not the fine details of motor and health insurance schemes.
It is fairly well known that conservatives are against the proposed health insurance scheme. Tagging the insurance as tax, due to the proposed execution method of the non-compliance penalty, is an obvious buzz word attack.
When someone is fined for not having car insurance, and they refuse to pay the fine, are they let off?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/27 00:56:09
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Da Head Honcho Boss Grot
|
Ah, you were just talking about the arguments that sprang up around the terminology? I thought you were saying the main reason for their opposition to the plan in general was partisanship, or something along those lines.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2009/09/28 19:42:41
Anuvver fing - when they do sumfing, they try to make it look like somfink else to confuse everybody. When one of them wants to lord it over the uvvers, 'e says "I'm very speshul so'z you gotta worship me", or "I know summink wot you lot don't know, so yer better lissen good". Da funny fing is, arf of 'em believe it and da over arf don't, so 'e 'as to hit 'em all anyway or run fer it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/27 01:08:56
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Wrexasaur wrote:Sounds like a pretty big mistake.
Not sure what else to add really. I have no problems with everyone being covered, and if I am not mistaken this would only be applied to a small segment of the population; i.e. if fateweaver is broke as a joke, then he will not be forced to by insurance. In fact he would be eligible for something like medi-caid, which sucks, but at least it is insurance.
Yea Im with you on that one WREX. I think that it will be limited to how much you make yearly. Just like every government help program. Obviously if you make decent amount of money, you cant get a food card. I bet the fines and penalties are for those that are OVER the line.
Medi-caid really is a joke insurance tho lol. I had it while installing cable (before my REAL insurance kicked in) and I had an "Accident" where I kicked a drill bit threw my foot. I stated that on the forms in the hospital, but apprently I had the wrong phone number on the form, and it was denied. I didnt know about the denial until over a year later when a debt collector called wanting to know why I was being an immature child and not paying on my $900 debt. I laughed and hung the phone up on him lol.
But at least medi caid works most the time
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/27 07:04:24
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
|
wait if there is public option than wouldn't you just get that and not have to worry about being fined.
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:
"Balance, playtesting - a casual gamer craves not these things!" - Yoda, a casual gamer.
Three things matter in marksmanship -
location, location, locationMagickalMemories wrote:How about making another fist?
One can be, "Da Fist uv Mork" and the second can be, "Da Uvver Fist uv Mork."
Make a third, and it can be, "Da Uvver Uvver Fist uv Mork"
Eric |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/27 11:39:46
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
ShumaGorath wrote:Entire pointless article
This article that you put up has nothing to do with the quality and amount of care provided by the Texas Medical Center. Have you any idea just how immense and incredible this place is? This is one story, and as I already noted, it doesn't describe the quality of the center, it only describes its capacity. But I guess since it has patients from nearly every country on the planet, not just the Houston area, or even just the US for that matter, it should always have an empty bed for everyone. Please, read the article and how it is applicable before posting. It is widely agreed, by professionals both in and out of the medical industry, that the Texas Medical Center in Houston is one of the, if not THE, greatest medical district in the world.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Medical_Center
|
DR:80+S(GT)G++M++B-I++Pwmhd05#+D+++A+++/sWD-R++T(Ot)DM+
How is it they live in such harmony - the billions of stars - when most men can barely go a minute without declaring war in their minds about someone they know.
- St. Thomas Aquinas
Warhammer 40K:
Alpha Legion - 15,000 pts For the Emperor!
WAAAGH! Skullhooka - 14,000 pts
Biel Tan Strikeforce - 11,000 pts
"The Eldar get no attention because the average male does not like confetti blasters, shimmer shields or sparkle lasers."
-Illeix |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/27 16:56:39
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
One can link to an article without reprinting the whole thing.
The idea behind mandatory insurance is that it will lower the risk pool for the population as a whole. If the non-discrimination (rejection for pre-existing conditions, family history, etc) clauses are in the final bill this sounds good. However, if there are no cost controls or regulations that prevent private insurance from charging whatever they want, then all the plan is is a giveaway to private insurance companies very similar to how Medicare Part D is a giveaway to the pharmacy companies. Nevermind the philosophical ramifications among much of the population.
For those who continually trot out the 9th and 10th amendments, you may want to also trot out the US Civil War which had a big impact on how those amendments have been interpreted.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 07:20:39
Subject: Re:Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
Right now, the philosophy in the US is that you choose to get your own insurance or not, which insurance companies are free to accept or reject. That hasn’t worked. The combination of a profit incentive among insurance companies and the idea that you can be rejected if you have a pre-existing medical condition has resulted in a lot of people being rejected for coverage because of something an insurer considered a pre-existing condition. That has resulted in medical debt being the primary cause of bankruptcy in the US.
Now, between the amount of insurance dollars being pumped into both parties and the level of panic we’ve seen over this minor level of reform, you simply aren’t going to get reform that removes the profit motive from private insurers (the idea that it has to be either the government option or private insurers operating for profit is an odd one, no-one seems to have even considered the idea of member oriented insurance schemes). So that leaves you with the idea of removing the ability of insurance companies to not insure someone.
It doesn’t take long, of course, for people to realise that if an insurance company can’t reject them then they can just wait until they’re sick before they get insurance. So you put in place a requirement that says if you’re wealthy enough to afford insurance but don’t get insurance then you have to pay something (you can call it a levy, a tax, a contribution or whatever, it’s just a word). That way you build a system where people aren’t booted out of their insurance because they just found out they’re going to need a lot of chemotherapy to stay alive, and that eight years earlier they ticked the wrong box on their insurance, but where everyone stays insured, spreading the costs out over everyone.
It does mean that if you don’t get insurance, get fined and don’t pay that fine, don’t make any allowance to pay that fine in future, and don’t submit to a payment plan structured by arbitration or by the courts, then a court might order you to spend some time in jail. That’s the price you pay for fighting socialist oppression.
|
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 08:10:12
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Dwarf High King with New Book of Grudges
United States
|
JEB_Stuart wrote:This article that you put up has nothing to do with the quality and amount of care provided by the Texas Medical Center.
The fact that the hospital is world-renowned makes the failure to provide adequate healthcare to the populace that much worse.
|
Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 09:18:32
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
dogma wrote:JEB_Stuart wrote:This article that you put up has nothing to do with the quality and amount of care provided by the Texas Medical Center. The fact that the hospital is world-renowned makes the failure to provide adequate healthcare to the populace that much worse.
The quote you have is taken out of context. You neglected to add on the next sentence which describes the criticism more accurately directed against the hospital's capacity, not its quality of care. The idea that any hospital should have enough room and staff to service any amount of people at all times is unrealistic and absurd. Especially, as I said, since people come all across the globe to receive treatment there. And don't forget, this is only 1 of 13 hospitals in the Medical Center. On top of that it is a county hospital, which in my experience have always been inferior to private ones. Oh, and I just got back word from my former roommate whose parents work as nursing and maintenance staff in the Medical Center, and they were both shocked that someone claimed it took months to see a doctor. They called this story a flat out lie and are in the process of writing an angry letter to USA Today. I personally have also never heard of anyone having to wait months to see a doctor, and my family isn't even insured!
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/09/28 09:20:53
DR:80+S(GT)G++M++B-I++Pwmhd05#+D+++A+++/sWD-R++T(Ot)DM+
How is it they live in such harmony - the billions of stars - when most men can barely go a minute without declaring war in their minds about someone they know.
- St. Thomas Aquinas
Warhammer 40K:
Alpha Legion - 15,000 pts For the Emperor!
WAAAGH! Skullhooka - 14,000 pts
Biel Tan Strikeforce - 11,000 pts
"The Eldar get no attention because the average male does not like confetti blasters, shimmer shields or sparkle lasers."
-Illeix |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/28 10:04:40
Subject: Really? Now it can mean jail time?
|
 |
Dwarf High King with New Book of Grudges
United States
|
JEB_Stuart wrote:
The quote you have is taken out of context. You neglected to add on the next sentence which describes the criticism more accurately directed against the hospital's capacity, not its quality of care.
I omitted the second sentence because it seemed to contradict the first. You are correct that quality was not touched on in the article, but capacity is certainly connected to the amount of care provided.
JEB_Stuart wrote:
The idea that any hospital should have enough room and staff to service any amount of people at all times is unrealistic and absurd.
Which explains why no one has claimed anything close to that affect.
JEB_Stuart wrote:
Especially, as I said, since people come all across the globe to receive treatment there. And don't forget, this is only 1 of 13 hospitals in the Medical Center. On top of that it is a county hospital, which in my experience have always been inferior to private ones.
The county hospital was a specific example designed to make a point about the state of healthcare in Texas as a whole. It also doesn't really matter if the hospital's shortcomings are justified by circumstance when the purpose of the article is to support an initiative predicated on changing that circumstance.
JEB_Stuart wrote:
Oh, and I just got back word from my former roommate whose parents work as nursing and maintenance staff in the Medical Center, and they were both shocked that someone claimed it took months to see a doctor. They called this story a flat out lie and are in the process of writing an angry letter to USA Today. I personally have also never heard of anyone having to wait months to see a doctor, and my family isn't even insured!
I don't see anything in there about waiting times in excess of a month. I see a lot of statistics that are designed to support the argument that the current system is overburdened correlated with another bunch of statistics relating to low rates of insurance. I assume the point is intended to be that low rates of insurance are putting too much strain on emergency and clinical services.
For what its worth, the problem isn't one of wait time (and the article only claimed that to be the case in a tangential fashion), but the ability to obtain actual treatment in the form of drugs, surgery, etc.
|
Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh. |
|
 |
 |
|