Switch Theme:

A rant on tournaments and how they are no indication of skill at all  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Foolproof Falcon Pilot






hmmm... start with 2 preset armies, no list building, no painting, nothing to bring, no sportmanship score, just skill vs. skill alone....

...sounds a whole heck of a lot like a chess tourney to me!

Oh, wait, they have been doing that for hundreds of years...

   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka



Chicago, Illinois

It's actually really fun. You get to play armies you normally do not get to play ; its all down to basic skill etc..

I played Dark Eldar, IG, Tyranids. 3 armies I dont have dont play.

The scenarios were all posted before hand; as were the armies that were going to be present so you knew what to get. Codexes were on hand.

I think the time was 2 : 20 hours at 1750 which is plenty of time with a break after 2nd round.

If I lose it is because I had bad luck, if you win it is because you cheated. 
   
Made in us
Bounding Assault Marine





Valdosta

I don't know... it seems to favor people who've been around the block more than the raw skill you're going for here.

See, I'm thinking by throwing armies out there a lot of people just wouldn't have a clue about how to play them.

In that case, it's more a matter of experience as opposed to skill.

Still, I do sort of like the whole thing where the winner get the $hit-gig pick for armies right after, lol. It means you don't have people go from domination builds for chaos to ork , etc..

Gwar: "Of course 99.999% of players don't even realise this, and even I am not THAT much of an ass to call on it (unless the guy was a total dick or a Scientologist, but that's just me)"

 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka



Chicago, Illinois

It worked really well and the time format was long 2 hours and 20 minutes for a 1750 is plenty of time really.


All the armies had a complete army list and brief explanation.


Also, remember that the armies are posted before hand you know what is going on what table just dont know what the terrain will be and if you will get defender or attacker.


It was actually a hard fought tournament NO ONE went 3 -0 at all. The best record was 2 and tie.

If I lose it is because I had bad luck, if you win it is because you cheated. 
   
Made in us
Bounding Assault Marine





Valdosta

Hmmm, I'll say this-- under all those situations... I think I wouldn't mind giving it a shot.

At the very least I think it would be cool to play as one of the Eldar armies (Dark or Reg), I've never done it before myself.

Gwar: "Of course 99.999% of players don't even realise this, and even I am not THAT much of an ass to call on it (unless the guy was a total dick or a Scientologist, but that's just me)"

 
   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User





you know I think it takes alot of skill to win a tournament

it takes skill to paint

skill to play

skill to not be a jerk to other players

and skill not to post whiney rants.

its warhammer, cry me a river and blow it up

   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran






I hope your post doesn't get bahleeted Kabizzle, because a lot of people need to read it and understand it.

Tombworld El'Lahaun 2500pts
Hive Fleet Vestis 5000pts
Disciples of Caliban 2000pts
Crimson Fist 2000pts
World Eaters 1850pts
Angels Encarmine 1850pts
Iron Hospitalers 1850 pts (Black Templar Successor)
Sons of Medusa 1850pts
Tartarus IXth Renegade Legion 2500pts
 
   
Made in us
Junior Officer with Laspistol






The eye of terror.

oKABOOMo wrote:you know I think it takes alot of skill to win a tournament

it takes skill to paint

skill to play

skill to not be a jerk to other players

and skill not to post whiney rants.

its warhammer, cry me a river and blow it up



You missed a few:

Skill to mail your army to the pro-painter

Skill to lower your opponent's soft scores, so he can't get best overall

Skill to make friends with the judges and TO so they favor you

While I agree that it takes skill to consistently win tournaments, there are lots of factors used by those that don't want to play fair... and the "good guys" aren't winning when they don't.

Why did the berzerker cross the road?
Gwar! wrote:Willydstyle has it correct
Gwar! wrote:Yup you're absolutely right

New to the game and can't win? Read this.

 
   
Made in us
Spawn of Chaos





Cheese Elemental wrote:Of course tournaments are a good indication of skill. It takes a massive amount of planning to use Lash/Oblits or Nob Bikers.


haha a stereotypical casual player, if you knew anything about what you are trying to say you would know that these armies have had little success now that most armies are mech, actually tyranids won the last major tourny (Bolscon) do a little resaerch before you make yourself look like a elitest casual gamer again.

definition of tournament: a competition in which contestants play a series of games to determine an overall winner.

Ooooohhhhhh C-A-T-S CATS CATS CATS!

I suk at speling :/ 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





saw54 wrote:
Cheese Elemental wrote:Of course tournaments are a good indication of skill. It takes a massive amount of planning to use Lash/Oblits or Nob Bikers.


haha a stereotypical casual player, if you knew anything about what you are trying to say you would know that these armies have had little success now that most armies are mech, actually tyranids won the last major tourny (Bolscon) do a little resaerch before you make yourself look like a elitest casual gamer again.


I wouldn't use tyranids winning at bolscon as an example of how tourneys are no indication of skill at all.

Sourclams wrote:He already had more necrons than anyone else. Now he wants to have more necrons than himself.


I play  
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: