Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Our own lovely Pixelgeek (or one of his associates) posted on TGN this weekend rumored changes to Warmachine units in the upcoming Prime Remix.

That list:

Haley
Temporal Barrier:
All enemy modells curently in Haleys control area…

Chain Guns
Strafe
If the first attack hits all additional attacks are at a +2 bonus to hit

Sorsha
Icy Gaze:
All enemy modells in LOS and curently in Sorshas control area…

Repenter
Flamethrower:
Models hit by Flamthrower get Fire.

Mechanics Cygnar/Khador
Jack Marshal (1)
Jacks can be activated after the Mechanics repaired them

Because its the right thing to do and because I know pixelgeek views it as a grave sin to omit your source:

www.tabletopgamingnews.com/

I'm particularly intrigued by the Jack Marshal quality being given to Mechanics.  (the other new property should be much lauded, too)  Will this inspire people to start playing with Mechanics?

Copied directly from NQ #10.

Posted By Ghaz on 01/07/2007 12:40 PM
Copied directly from NQ #10.

Copied from various forum posts actually. Its mentioned in the original article that the info was found in various places. Its pulled from two posts in the Warmachine forum primarily.

I haven't read NQ 10 yet. My FLGS manager got a shipment of magazines and figs in this week and never told anyone about it so I'll have to wait til the end of next week to get mine/.

Posted By redstripe on 01/07/2007 11:22 AM
Because its the right thing to do and because I know pixelgeek views it as a grave sin to omit your source:

I pretty much did the same thing you did in this case so I'm not sure I'd care :-)

If you want to cite an actual source I can dig up the URLs to the post that I found the info in or, as Ghaz mentions, its in NQ 10.

I didn't actually determine that it was in the magazine, for certain,  until after I posted it