Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2007/01/31 18:07:06
Subject: How important is terrain in WM?
|
|
Foul Dwimmerlaik
|
Just curious, as I would like to throw my COD stuff down on a WM table, but dont have access to rules so that I may decide what role terrain plays in WM? Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
2007/02/01 00:43:04
Subject: RE: How important is terrain in WM?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Pretty much the same as it does in 40K and WHFB.
I would say the biggest thing about terrain is "rough terrain." Since it reduces movement, it prevents charging unless you have a special rule that ignores rough terrain.
|
All problems can be solved with proper use of a high powered rifle and a water tower |
|
|
|
2007/02/01 00:47:51
Subject: RE: How important is terrain in WM?
|
|
Clousseau
|
Terrain is pretty huge. Rough Terrain, cover, etc. are all pretty essential elements, especially as it's played on a 4x4 table. Units/solos/jacks that advance deploy, or have 'pathfinder', 'stealth' or 'all-terrain' (different rules that allow you to traverse rough terrain more easily, set up further afield or otherwise benefit from cover more effectively) become killer because of this.
I don't think you see a lot of buildings per se; perhaps one or two, and some ruins, but I don't see why you couldn't do a WH cityfight game (I've seen a few city tables in fact).
|
Guinness: for those who are men of the cloth and football fans, but not necessarily in that order.
I think the lesson here is the best way to enjoy GW's games is to not use any of their rules.--Crimson Devil |
|
|
|
2007/02/01 02:25:22
Subject: RE: How important is terrain in WM?
|
|
Master of the Hunt
|
CoD stuff could be cool. Elevation can be a big component in WM. It effects LOS, Defense, and can cause damage if you fall (lots if you're high up!).
|
"It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the seed of Arabica that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains, the stains become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion." |
|
|
|
2007/02/01 10:03:29
Subject: RE: How important is terrain in WM?
|
|
Foul Dwimmerlaik
|
ahhh so WM is considerably more 3 dimensional when concerning terrain. Brilliant.
|
|
|
|
|
2007/02/01 10:35:00
Subject: RE: How important is terrain in WM?
|
|
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Well, open fields favor shooting and rush combat. Difficult terrain favors all-terrain and pathfinders. Elevation, cover, and concealment also play a potentially large role.
In Hordes, terrain is even more important thanks to the proliferation of abilities that work off terrain (especially Circle and Legion).
|
-James
|
|
|
|
2007/02/01 11:40:20
Subject: RE: How important is terrain in WM?
|
|
Dakka Veteran
|
Not to mention the huge amount of throwing that usually goes on in Hordes... throwing models off or into terrain can cause alot of damage
|
|
|
|
2007/02/10 23:35:55
Subject: RE: How important is terrain in WM?
|
|
Dominating Dominatrix
|
I need to build some cliffs where the models can fall down from....
I thin the CoD buildings are a bit too sci-fi for the iron kingdoms, but Mordtheim Buildings should work out quite nicely.
|
|
|
|
2007/02/20 14:06:58
Subject: RE: How important is terrain in WM?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
Bellevue, WA
|
Terrain is very important. Especially size. WM terrain is generally smaller than Warhammer and 40k terrain. 4x6 to 6x6 are about the right size.
|
|
|
|
|