Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/03/16 19:34:21
Subject: Why is DE on back burner?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
OLD MAN ULTRAMARINES' BASEMENT
|
Does anyone know why GW put the new DE line and codex on the back burner again?
|
PEACE OUT HOMIES!!!ONE111!!!
ON A ROPE!
1K SONS?
Username "teachermickeymouse" for all your SM and orc needs. Ebay.com
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/03/16 19:41:14
Subject: Re:Why is DE on back burner?
|
 |
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego
|
To enrage people on the internet.
Plus they have a little pool running on who snaps first between Messrs. HBMC and 'Wang.
*crosses fingers for July*
...or it might be as it takes time to redo a model range, get the codex right, write, do artwork and get it right this time, whilst juggling all those other projects at the same time. They have done work on them already though.
|
The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king, |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/03/16 19:42:07
Subject: Why is DE on back burner?
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Because none of the GW Devs actually play DE, so dont want to risk making a gakky unfluffy codex
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/03/16 19:53:36
Subject: Why is DE on back burner?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Also They need to resculpt the whole line, and from there point of view they don't think the army will sell well.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/03/16 19:54:06
Subject: Why is DE on back burner?
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
This thread is neither news, nor rumor.
The answer to this question (via speculative discussion) has already been done to death in many other threads already (please do a search if you'd like to read up on this subject).
As such, this thread is being locked as being redundant.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/03/16 19:54:42
|
|
 |
 |
|