Switch Theme:

Flames of War. US Late War. What use for Recce?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User





I am working on my US Late War Army based on buying things that I thought looked cool then deciding to make a set of lists for what I owned. (I have not actually played a game yet.)
I purchased several M8 Greyhounds and considered making a Recon Cavalry list out of Fortress Europe or Operation Cobra books but I cannot see how this list would do well.I am moving to making a list focused on Operation Cobra Tank Company.

It seems that the real life use for the recce platoons was find areas where the enemy was not and exploit them.If the enemy was about they had just about enough armor to run away and try to find another way.Basically they are pathfinders and not direct combat types.

It doesn't seem to me that this role actually works in the Flames of War objective system.

The question I have then is what real role can these M8 Greyhounds fill and should I actually incorporate them into a list.
I think they could be used for attacking infantry strong points such as machine gun nests and I also see them being useful as a screen to prevent ambushers from getting to your harder units.
Is either of these valid roles or are they worth the points to include in my Tank Company lists.

Another question would be...could a Cavalry Recon list actually be practical in the game?


Thanks for any feedback you can provide.
I hope to find opponents to play once I finish painting my collection (something that is going slowly).

   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka





Sheffield, UK

I believe that greyhounds can form part of an M10 platoon.
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Philadelphia, PA

Another question would be...could a Cavalry Recon list actually be practical in the game?

>I have been trying on and off for the last few years, but it is an uphill battle. Recon with all its .50cals will tear up infantry and armored cars/halftracks with ease, but even medium tanks leave them helpless

Clear the battlefield and let me see
All the profit from our victory.
 
   
Made in us
Gefreiter




The Most competitive Late War US lists are US armoured Rifles followed by the Tank Coy out of Cobra, 2nd and 3rd Arm Div.

The M8's can be used in a recce platoon thats is a platoon in either an arm rifle or arm coy list. 2 M8, mtr jeep and recon jeep.
   
Made in ca
Imperial Recruit in Training





Canada

James Caan driving a jeep!
   
Made in ca
Regular Dakkanaut



Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

I have found that taking a recce force in a regular mission can be a bit of a challenge.

But these missions are fun
http://www.flamesofwar.com/Default.aspx?tabid=111&kb_cat_id=32
   
Made in hk
Death-Dealing Devastator






Virginia USA

I have been finding that all list need to be a mix of infantry, anti-armor, arty....and your special units in each list. I like the U.S. list but recon units are tricky and easily knocked out. especially if they don't have support. I have been using "Stewart M5" tanks as a quasi recon unit. they are fast, pack some firepower , can get close to units fast. Yes they don't have the "eyes and ears" recon rule. but they can last a bit and do some damage.

The difficult anytime, the impossible by appointment only!! 
   
 
Forum Index » Historical Miniature Games: WW1 to Modern
Go to: