Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 16:15:28
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Implacable Skitarii
|
Can a PBS use Weaken Resolve from a transport that has any of these properties?
a. Moved cruising or flat out
b. Used smoke launchers
c. Has no fire points
Weaken Resolve is not a shooting attack, and only requires LOS and range. Speed and Smoke only say they prevent the passengers from shooting. I can't find anything concrete about fire points and LOS for things that are not shooting. Orders from a chimera say measure range and LOS from any point on the hull, but that is a chimera rule so only a precedent.
Now that I think about it, can IG orders be issued from a. or b. as well?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 16:19:34
Subject: Re:Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Brainy Zoanthrope
|
A: No
B: Yes
C: No
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 16:29:47
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Implacable Skitarii
|
What logic did you use to come to those conclusions? Just saying yes or no doesn't resolve much.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 16:31:36
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Gestalt wrote:Can a PBS use Weaken Resolve from a transport that has any of these properties? a. Moved cruising or flat out b. Used smoke launchers c. Has no fire points Weaken Resolve is not a shooting attack, and only requires LOS and range. Speed and Smoke only say they prevent the passengers from shooting. I can't find anything concrete about fire points and LOS for things that are not shooting. Orders from a chimera say measure range and LOS from any point on the hull, but that is a chimera rule so only a precedent. Now that I think about it, can IG orders be issued from a. or b. as well?
If you use the INAT FAQ, the answer is Yes, No and No, but RaW "B" is yes. I think Warboss is under the impression that WR is a Shooting power, which it is not. As for Orders, they can only be issued from a Chimera, but you can do it when the Chimera went Cruising Speed or Popped smoke no problem.
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2010/03/07 16:36:13
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 16:36:25
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Gestalt wrote:What logic did you use to come to those conclusions? Just saying yes or no doesn't resolve much.
Because all psychic powers require a firepoint unless specifically stated otherwise.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 16:37:41
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:Gestalt wrote:What logic did you use to come to those conclusions? Just saying yes or no doesn't resolve much.
Because all psychic powers require a firepoint unless specifically stated otherwise.
True, so you cannot use it when on a no Fire Point transport, but can use it from a Chimera thats gone Cruising because it only needs a fire point and isn't shooting so you can use it
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 16:37:42
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Implacable Skitarii
|
I looked in the INAT faq and didnt see anything saying B was a no. It just refers to shooting.
nosferatu1001 wrote:Because all psychic powers require a firepoint unless specifically stated otherwise.
Where is this rule? What about a power that is not shooting and does not require LOS? Can you not use it without a fire point?
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/03/07 16:47:27
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 16:38:14
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Gestalt wrote:I looked in the INAT faq and didnt see anything saying B was a no. It just refers to shooting.
Huh, my mistake then. So the answer is Yes, Yes and No then. A I already Explained. B because that's the RaW and C because if you have no Fire Points, you cannot ever draw LoS.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/03/07 16:38:42
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 16:59:21
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
Boston, Massachusetts
|
The transport section in the BRB actually says you need a firepoint to use psychic powers from a transport, and it doesn't make a distinction of whether the power requires LoS or not.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 17:33:30
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Implacable Skitarii
|
It says a fire point may be used to use a psychic power, not that a power can only be used from a fire point and nothing else. If a fire point is the only way to use a power in a vehicle, psykers cannot use powers in open topped vehicles which have no fire points and open topped refers only to shooting.
If a power did not require LOS and was not a shooting attack it would not need to use a fire point. I don't know of any powers that do that off the top of my head so its more of a thought experiment pointing out a rule that should be clarified.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 19:22:25
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Well, you have permission to use a fire point to use your psychic power, but you dont have permission otherwise. Now, given this is a permissive ruleset what do you think you are allowed to do?
Eldar FAQ covers this, btw
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 21:19:05
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Brainy Zoanthrope
|
Ah, yes I was under the impression it was a psychic shooting attack. My bad.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/08 01:39:13
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:Well, you have permission to use a fire point to use your psychic power, but you dont have permission otherwise. Now, given this is a permissive ruleset what do you think you are allowed to do?
Well it's easy to skew the answer when you make up facts like "but you don't have permission otherwhise", the fire point reference to psychic powers simply allows a fire point to be used for a psychic power, it does not mean that psychic powers cannot be used without them, anything which does not require LOS can be used without needing a fire point.
|
Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).
-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/08 06:01:19
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Huh?
No, permissive ruleset - you are given permission to use psychic powers *which are not PSA* without having a fire point, however ANY PSA must still use a fire point, regardless of it needing LOS.
Now, what type of attack is Weaken Resolve again? Ah right, a PSA....
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/08 07:21:57
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
If by PSA you mean Psychic Shooting Attack, well, you're wrong, It's not a shooting attack, even tho it occurs in the shooting phase.
|
Don "MONDO"
www.ironfistleague.com
Northern VA/Southern MD |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/08 07:40:24
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Except it cannot be used without a firepoint, as it requires LOS.
Meaning the FAQ answer about psychic powers not requiring LOS being used fvrom vehicles without a firepoint does not apply, as it requires LOS.
So you still only have permission to use a fire point to use psychic powers, unless it is something that is not PSA and does not need LOS.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/08 07:44:11
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
Didn't dispute that part, yes, it requires LOS and that means it needs a firepoint to be used from inside a vehicle. We're in agreement there.
nosferatu1001 wrote:
Now, what type of attack is Weaken Resolve again? Ah right, a PSA....
This is the part I'm disagreeing with. All I said is it's not a Psychic Shooting Attack. Which means that the transport can move Cruising speed and you can still cast it. Couldn't do that if it wa a PSA...................
|
Don "MONDO"
www.ironfistleague.com
Northern VA/Southern MD |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/08 08:02:11
Subject: Psyker Battle Squads and transports
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I was getting thatand the S:X one confused, it was a long running thread.
I do wish they would state things are "normal" and "shooting" psychic attacks, rather than having to infer it isnt...
|
|
 |
 |
|