| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2008/02/23 05:18:02
Subject: Retro Review WD 109-Titans and Imperial Guard!
|
|
Dakka Veteran
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:You got issue 141 Kyoto? The one with the first 40K Battle Report (BA vs Eldar)?
BYE
I could do this one, actually. I mean really, me? Doing a WD review? What could go wrong?...
--Chris
www.chrisvalera.com
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/02/23 05:18:22
Looking for the Empire spearmen from the Warhammer sixth edition box set (empire vs orcs) Must be unpainted and in good condition. Also looking for MIB Empire State Troops boxes.
Looking for Battle for Macragge and Black Reach Tactical squads, unpainted and unassembled. |
|
|
 |
|
2008/02/23 12:59:36
Subject: Retro Review WD 109-Titans and Imperial Guard!
|
|
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche
|
chris_valera wrote:H.B.M.C. wrote:You got issue 141 Kyoto? The one with the first 40K Battle Report (BA vs Eldar)?
BYE
I could do this one, actually. I mean really, me? Doing a WD review? What could go wrong?...
--Chris
www.chrisvalera.com
I don't have that issue so feel free. But be warned you'd be the 3rd to follow in my footsteps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008/02/23 16:15:32
Subject: Retro Review WD 109-Titans and Imperial Guard!
|
|
Fireknife Shas'el
A bizarre array of focusing mirrors and lenses turning my phrases into even more accurate clones of
|
Wow, I hadn't noticed it yet. Chris is back, sweet!
|
WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS WARHAMS
2009, Year of the Dog
 |
|
|
|
|
2008/02/23 16:29:26
Subject: Retro Review WD 109-Titans and Imperial Guard!
|
|
Secretive Dark Angels Veteran
Baltimore, MD
|
Yeah, seems Dakka may be seeing a resurgence of the "old folk" returning.
Cool sig by the way stonefox. 
|
Proud owner of  & 
Play the game, not the rules.
|
|
|
|
|
2008/02/24 13:02:27
Subject: Retro Review WD 109-Titans and Imperial Guard!
|
|
Foul Dwimmerlaik
|
chris_valera wrote:H.B.M.C. wrote:You got issue 141 Kyoto? The one with the first 40K Battle Report (BA vs Eldar)?
BYE
I could do this one, actually. I mean really, me? Doing a WD review? What could go wrong?...
--Chris
www.chrisvalera.com
unbannination for the win?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008/02/24 16:39:22
Subject: Retro Review WD 109-Titans and Imperial Guard!
|
|
[DCM]
Sentient OverBear
|
chris_valera wrote:I could do this one, actually. I mean really, me? Doing a WD review? What could go wrong?...
--Chris
www.chrisvalera.com
Profanity, trolling, off-topic, rudeness...
Oh, 'twas a rhetorical question. My mistake.
|
DQ:70S++G+++M+B++I+Pw40k94+ID+++A++/sWD178R+++T(I)DM+++
Trust me, no matter what damage they have the potential to do, single-shot weapons always flatter to deceive in 40k. Rule #1
- BBAP
|
|
|
|
|
2008/02/25 03:40:58
Subject: Retro Review WD 109-Titans and Imperial Guard!
|
|
Foul Dwimmerlaik
|
Hey! I take umbrage with the implication of off-topic being negative. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
