Switch Theme:

The thing that I don't like about the necron codex  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Omnipotent Necron Overlord






 vipoid wrote:
 Xenomancers wrote:
More units should be core is my main complaint.

lokust Destroyers
canoptec scarabs
flayed ones

These not being core units is utterly silly.

Meanwhile...space marine dreads are core...theres like...10 to 20 dreads in a 1000 man chapter? Literally millions of scarabs in a necron invasion force?


I'd agree with this.

However, I think it also highlights the problem that 'core' is such an utterly worthless term. Not only that, but we've got this bizarre situation wherein 'core' is entirely separate from 'troops' and also entirely separate from any sort of mandatory army requirements.

We seem to be acquiring more and more army-building mechanics, but without every discarding the old ones.

Also, I'm open to the idea of keywords, but there are so many now (most entirely superfluous) that it just looks as if someone vomited a thesaurus onto every dataslate.
Taking the words right out of my mouth.

If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran




I'm gonna play them anyway, because feth marines in 9th. My 25 year old Ba collection can sit on the shelf. I'm embarrassed to even own them at this point.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/10/30 18:54:48


 
   
Made in us
Omnipotent Necron Overlord






 Ghaz wrote:
 Xenomancers wrote:
More units should be core is my main complaint.

lokust Destroyers
canoptec scarabs
flayed ones

These not being core units is utterly silly.

And it is supported by the fluff that they should NOT be Core (see 'Outsiders and Exiles' on page 19 of Codex Necrons).
Honestly haven't had any look at the fluff yet. Why do they get dynasty traits then...I'd imagine exiles wouldn't get dynasty traits for the same reason they don't get core.

If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: