Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Looks like a cool project and it's always fun to see someone trying something new.
Something to be wary of though... GW have put out new Rules on 3rd party animations effectively *Banning* them and this may fall foul of that ban.
Tristanleo wrote: Looks like a cool project and it's always fun to see someone trying something new.
Something to be wary of though... GW have put out new Rules on 3rd party animations effectively *Banning* them and this may fall foul of that ban.
Yes, that is something I've worried about lately.
This project has been in work for over 5 years now, long before any of GW's purges, but I hope I could get around it due to it not being regular 3D animation and none profit.
Well reception to the recent GW changes has been pretty cold to date, so depending on responses it could be walked back or revised.
You did say that the project was about a year out, so a lot could happen.
Anyway, I could give a shot at voicing some lines for you if you're still looking.
blood reaper wrote: I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote: Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote: GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
Well, I would say that this project has taking me longer time than I first expected.
I only work on it mostly on my spare time, but I would say the the raw animation is about 45% completed.
Well, I would say that this project has taking me longer time than I first expected.
I only work on it mostly on my spare time, but I would say the the raw animation is about 45% completed.
No worries, I was just curious.
What I've seen is looking really impressive. Will be great to see the finished thing.
blood reaper wrote: I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote: Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote: GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.