Switch Theme:

How Do You Want Named Characters Handled?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
How should named characters be handled?
Nothing but generic characters, period
Most all named characters should be buildable from generic datasheets
Some generic builds can have names, but named characters should usually be unique and special
Make everything bespoke

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Ultramarine Chaplain with Hate to Spare






 LunarSol wrote:
I can't fault tournament players for playing the game that's given to them. The most toxic games I've played have been of the "who pulled their punches least" variety where each player draws an invisible line the other isn't expected to cross.

There are definitely ways to write rules that work casually while still holding up to competitive scrutiny. That's generally the direction I root for.
I'm definitely ok with competitive scrutiny, but only to a point. I think the measure to meet is if each faction has at least a few few different ways to compete at the top tier. But for me it stops there, because I think below that it's fine for all sorts of options and customization to exist that may not be the most competitive in tournament scenarios, but can exist in-universe or at least fill a role against specific types of armies or in specific situations that can occur as part of the background. The Grenade Launcher example is a good one. It may not have been the competitive choice if you're going into a tournament likely festooned with 3+ saves. But if your local meta happens to have more "soft" infantry and light vehicles, then the GL should be there. And if it, in universe, is a less valuable item to have then a Plasma gun or Melttagun, it's fine if it costs fewer points to field. I would rather the game version appropriately represent its capabilities instead of artificially boosting it to compete with other weapons just because GW wants to minimize math.

And They Shall Not Fit Through Doors!!!

Tyranid Army Progress -- With Classic Warriors!:
https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/743240.page#9671598 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: