Switch Theme:

Article Discussion: AF's tactical advice  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us



This is an automated message added by the articles system.

A new article titled AF's tactical advice has been added to the dakka articles system.

This message thread is for the discussion of content in the article.

If you have anything to add to the article, then just jump in and edit it by going to the actual article page and clicking 'edit' (the link can be found just above the article). If there is no edit link then the article is locked for now, so just add your comments or content to this thread and if they are appropriate then they should eventually get merged in.

If there is something in the article that you wish to debate or comment on, then this is the place to do it. Just hit the reply button and get chatting! You need to be registered and logged in to post in the forums so if you are an anonymous article editor then now would be a great time to register and join in dakka's great forum discussion!
   
Made in au
Stormin' Stompa






YO DAKKA DAKKA!

I don't remember writing any of that.
   
Made in us
Rotting Sorcerer of Nurgle





^Heh, you wish.
___________

Meh. If it'll get him to stop leading threads into 10 page discussions I'm all for it.

Lesser Daemons section: AF is still ignoring a specific word, that the LD's are "relatively" cheap to CSMs....he trieds to see it from 'our' point of view but he's only looking at 'naked' CSMs....few, if anybody, take naked CSMs, so the comparable cost is realistically around 50% instead of '83%'.

As for being junk, they are junk that wins games for people even in competitive environments. Their unuse is not 100% attributed to their codex entry...

But this is not going to get anywhere because there is only black and white and no allowance for shades of greys in a discussion with AF.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2010/12/15 13:37:15


This is a little story about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody.
There was an important job to be done and Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it.
Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it.
Somebody got angry about that because it was Everybody's job.
Everybody thought that Anybody could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn't do it.
It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have done.
 
   
 
Forum Index » Article Discussion
Go to: