tsz52 wrote:They wouldn't have let a licensee mess with their IP to that magnitude without approval (and FFG's fluff is considered official)
They constantly allow Black Library authors to "get away" with all sorts of stuff, so why not? All that
FFG has is a license to work with the franchise. They do not "own" it, and if
GW doesn't want to follow their ideas they are in no position to be forced doing so.
As Gav Thorpe already said about
BL novels,
"if an author has a bit of a wobbly moment, there’s no pressure to feel that it has to be accepted into the worldview promulgated by the codexes and army books."
Actually, unless Kurgan (from the Bolter & Chainsword group who got to playtest
GW and actually have a chat with the designers) was lying, they were explicitly told that
FFG's
RPG "wasn't canonical unless
GW said so".
Don't get me wrong - of course we may still see a major "retcon" of the setting, it's just that I have yet to see it happen. And considering in
how many small yet critical things they differ...
Starting with the two "classes" of weapons.
tsz52 wrote:Already laid the groundwork with GKs now being the whole Inquisition's Chamber Militant; and distancing the SoB from the Inquisition in the WD minidex (in the same way that DW can now be independent).
... I actually didn't catch the bit about the
GK's now being in service to the Inquisition as a whole, so thanks for making me check up!
Interesting thread on B&C on the subject:
http://www.bolterandchainsword.com/index.php?showtopic=226872
As for the Sisters of Battle, they always used to be "independent" (well, under command of the Ecclesiarch), so the
WD minidex didn't really change anything. However, I too am curious now what this means for their Nephilim
alliance with the Ordo Hereticus, as this wasn't even hinted at. Of course, it is worth noting that
FFG's
RPG still has them as a Chamber Militant, so regardless of whether the
DW and
SoB are still operating as per their established role or not, the
RPGs are out of synch with the newest
GW material either way.
Still, it may be too soon to draw conclusions for the Deathwatch. It is quite possible that they continue to exist alongside the
GKs, and I honestly don't think it would make sense for the Inquisition to condone a Space Marine Chapter not under their explicit control to possess a huge
fleet of Exterminatus-equipped, servitor-controlled droneships that cannot even be traced or detected by any of the Ordos. Where would they even
get this sort of stuff from?
I'll admit that my belief is largely founded in my biased hope, for I do consider a number of
FFG's writings to have "raped" the setting, to employ a nerdrage term.
For the moment, at least I still have Merrett's introductory speech in the
DW book to cling to, where he mentions that the
FFG team has pursued a number of "different ideas" than the guys at
GW.
That being said, it may even be possible that
GW has removed the Deathwatch from the setting - seeing as it is the only organization not mentioned
at all in the 5E rulebook. Both the Grey Knights as well as the Sisters of Battle have an entry in the "Defenders of the Imperium" article of the book whilst the Deathwatch remain absent.
I've also taken a brief glance at the 5E Space Marine Codex, and there too only the Grey Knights are ever mentioned as a special case. Coincidence or part of a wider development?
I have to say, I would kind of miss the Deathwatch as the Ordo Xenos' Chamber Militant. The basic idea was cool - though I would rather see them removed than become completely independent.
tsz52 wrote:Soz if this has already been discussed to death, but I haven't seen any posts about this anywhere.
I don't think it actually has, so it may be high time this stuff is discussed.