Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
While it was a good book, a good read, it really didnt offer any bloody insight into the macharian crusade, being as it was a third person account of a single battle that involved personal intervention of the lord solar macharius.
whoever pitched this tepid feces onto King, should be tarred, feathered and strung up.
Wasted oppurtunities, i.e why was the inquisitor attached to macharius entourage suspected of duplicious behaviour.
What was the bloody crusade, who was Solar himself?
The amount of first person character development they missed with the book is staggering.
but it was a book by William King, i.e good pacing, good action, and the tank tactics made my little general salute at times.
stylism, its well written, good entertainment; but going in with the expectation that you'll get some form of first person narrative of the macharian crusade and you get.. well. yeah. that.
!
1,500 
