| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/17 12:04:37
Subject: Thunderhammer vs vehicles?
|
 |
Daemonic Dreadnought
|
Didn't Thunderhammers used to do something to vehicles as well as reducing models to Initative 1?
I can't see it in the rulebook and i've never been ale to use them before the new chaos dex came out soi never actually read much about them.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/17 12:07:17
Subject: Thunderhammer vs vehicles?
|
 |
Judgemental Grey Knight Justicar
|
Every time they hit it causes a shaken on a tank.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/17 12:08:32
Subject: Thunderhammer vs vehicles?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
They used to Shake vehicles without an Init value. Concussive, which is the new uSR they have, has no effect on vehicles
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/17 12:21:02
Subject: Thunderhammer vs vehicles?
|
 |
Daemonic Dreadnought
|
aww, crud.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/17 16:05:48
Subject: Re:Thunderhammer vs vehicles?
|
 |
Speedy Swiftclaw Biker
|
Just to play the devils advocate, while in the rule book it does say that they don't affect vehicles anymore with concussive weapons. The codex itself says that it still does, and since codexs trump the rule book, and the faqs don't say to use the warhammer 40k rulebook definition. Then I would say that they still do.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/17 16:10:39
Subject: Thunderhammer vs vehicles?
|
 |
The Hive Mind
|
Page 99 C:SM references the rule book for what Thunderhammers do.
Blood Angels also references the BRB.
Ditto Space Wolves.
Oh look, Grey Knights also reference the BRB.
I don't have the DA or BT codexes to check those, would someone mind?
|
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/17 16:12:12
Subject: Re:Thunderhammer vs vehicles?
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
warhawkstriker wrote: The codex itself says that it still does, and since codexs trump the rule book, and the faqs don't say to use the warhammer 40k rulebook definition. Then I would say that they still do.
Which codex are you thinking of? Codex: Space Marines says see the rulebook, as does C: SW, C:Chaos, C: GK and C: BA. The only ones that still shake, that I know, of is C: BT and C: DA and both of them were Errata'd to say to look at the rulebook. Automatically Appended Next Post: Aww, partially ninja'd by rigeld2.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/10/17 16:12:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/17 16:13:59
Subject: Re:Thunderhammer vs vehicles?
|
 |
Speedy Swiftclaw Biker
|
haha my mistake, I was thinking of the seismic hammer in C:SM, or not, guess I was entirely mistaken.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/10/17 16:15:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/17 16:15:43
Subject: Re:Thunderhammer vs vehicles?
|
 |
The Hive Mind
|
warhawkstriker wrote:haha my mistake, I was thinking of the seismic hammer in C: SM, or not, guess I was entirely mistaken.
... The one that doesn't shake vehicles?
|
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/17 16:16:44
Subject: Re:Thunderhammer vs vehicles?
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
rigeld2 wrote: warhawkstriker wrote:haha my mistake, I was thinking of the seismic hammer in C: SM, or not, guess I was entirely mistaken.
... The one that doesn't shake vehicles?
Yeah, that one!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|