Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
solkan wrote:In my honest opinion, when a tournament group goes to the trouble of assembling a 118 page FAQ to address the various problems with the rules, and even THAT ends up being incomplete, you may as well just give up on RAW vs. RAI and move on to voting for "Fair vs. Unfair" as a standard for what changes to use.
solkan wrote:In my honest opinion, when a tournament group goes to the trouble of assembling a 118 page FAQ to address the various problems with the rules, and even THAT ends up being incomplete, you may as well just give up on RAW vs. RAI and move on to voting for "Fair vs. Unfair" as a standard for what changes to use.
I feel like C myself, if you want to make houserules and all participants agree, then go for it. But I voted B, because in order to be ready for tournaments, which are typically run B, you should be used to playing B.
The Daemonic Alliance Infinite Points
Nightbringer's Darkness 3000 Points
Titan's Knights of the Round: 4000 points
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." JFK
The Daemonic Alliance 
Infinite Points
Nightbringer's Darkness 
Titan's Knights of the Round: 4000 points 