Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

nosferatu1001 wrote:El Cheezus: if you are told you can move, and are not restricted in any way, then you can move in any direction.

So I can move a Space Marine up then. Into the air, and have him remain there by virtue of the wobbly model rule. Awesome.

Any model excepting skimmers, yes(they are specifically denied the ability to be placed in open-air).

KK - not a she, but thanks for the support here otherwise!

I lol'd the first time Gwar! called me a lady...!

I agree it could of been more valid stated differrently, but that does not make it a personal attack.

Kommissar Kel wrote:

jbunny wrote:

Kommissar Kel wrote:

JBW wrote:

nosferatu1001 wrote:El Cheezus: if you are told you can move, and are not restricted in any way, then you can move in any direction. You move in any direction, and simply check - did you move? Yes? Then you have complied with the only requirement

The BRB does not need to define Forwards; English does. Same as the BRB does not define "the", "a" or other wprds - you use English where needed

Aren't you the person that thinks an unit disembarking, while an IC stays embarked, is required to be outside of 2" from the transport hull or else it is still joined? I think I'll pass on your rules interpretations for now.

Considering that is technically how those rules work(although she also said absolutely no-one plays it that way)...

Personal attacks are generally not very well received in YMDC. Also; pointing out RAW-holes, while simultaneously referring to the fact that the RAP is not done that way does not make someone bad at interpreting the rules.

Not sure how any of what JBW said was a personal attack.

The essence of the statement was: "I disagree with your interpretation on another thread, therefore you must not know what you are talking about" Had JBW left out the entirety of the other thread discussion, and/or contributed his view in any way to this discussion; then the post would have been more valid.

The essesnce was more like this; "I have stated my points in previous posts and I absolutely disagree with another thread to the point I find it ridiculous, and I also feel that this topic is too, a poor example of interpretations of the rules from the same person." This 'all' and 'never' is gone too far. I didn't imply that I think the person in question will always have poor interpretations, nor did I imply that I will never listen to them. So enough about that...

Maybe we can model our vehicles on circular bases and get rid of the tracks, and mount all the weapons on rotating magnetized turrets. This should solve the thread issue.