Switch Theme:

unbound formations?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in at
Fresh-Faced New User





hey guys, im just now getting into 7th again, quick question:

can formations be unbound too? unbound is ignoring the FOC, formations may force you to get certain units (2 troop, 1 fast for example). who overrides who?
or are they seperate entities?

for example, i want to Baal Strike Force Detachment, but dont want to get the second troop unit, can i just go unbound? (note that in this example, the army consists only out of 1 formation)

would that work?
   
Made in gb
Secret Inquisitorial Eldar Xenexecutor





UK

No.

To elaborate more your get set bonuses from a formation for taking it exactly as listed. If you do not take it as listed you have not taken the formation and therefore do not recieve the bonuses.

Soon his foes would learn that the only thing more dangerous than a savage three hundred pound brute is a savage three hundred pound brute with a plan - Ork Codex

30K Imperial Fist Progress
Tale of 6 Gamers - 30K

I've recently started taking on commissions, if you'd like to talk a project over feel free to PM me here, or find me at:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BasiliskStudios
Email: Basilisk.Studios@yahoo.co.uk 
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





Buffalo, NY

There is a difference between Formations and Detachments.

All formations are detachments but not all detachments are formations.

In order to get Detachment bonuses you must be battle-forged.

In order to get Formation bonuses you must meet the minimum requirements for that formation.

Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia 
   
Made in at
Fresh-Faced New User





yea, nothing else would have made sense to me.
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




I'm reasonably sure you can technically take full detachments as a subset of a larger unbound army.

You cannot however take formation or detachment benefits without meeting minimum requirements.
   
Made in hk
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






You don't make individual Detachments "Unbound"; instead, you choose whether or not your whole Army is Unbound.

You can't take any Detachments in an Unbound army. Formations are the only exception to this, but you still must take the whole formation in order to gain its special rules.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





You cannot take detachments in an unbound list.

You can take formations however, and the models in the formation retain their formation bonuses as per the rulebook under formations and unbound.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: