| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/12 16:02:51
Subject: Where/how/when All the new Daemon rules?
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
Not sure if this goes here or in the rumours thread, but....
-In what book can I get ALL of the new Daemon formations/relics/psychic powers etc?
-And when does it officially drop?
-Do I have to buy the Curse of the Wulfen campaign book or is there a WD or updated Daemon book?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/12 16:07:50
Subject: Where/how/when All the new Daemon rules?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Curse of the wulfen campaign book. It's on pre order now. (,£45) that's the only book.
Probably will be a card deck at some point (that's what I'll be getting)
Check out atias war of sigmar site .
|
DFTT |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/12 16:24:01
Subject: Where/how/when All the new Daemon rules?
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
Thanks, I'll check the preorder date.
I run a very undivided list (all 4 gods must be represented) so the "multi-formation/auxilery" detachment doesn't look too appealing to me since it look slike you have to field tons of 1 god for it to work. However some of the rumoured items and powers seems neat.
I have been fortunate enough so far to have 1-source armies (Eldar and Daemons currently only need their codecies for all their rules) but it looks like these additions to the Daemons are must haves.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/12 17:19:19
Subject: Where/how/when All the new Daemon rules?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Well the four Prince formation looks like the one for you!
The other formations and detachment are really clunky, but yeah the relics are quite good.
|
DFTT |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/12 17:56:44
Subject: Where/how/when All the new Daemon rules?
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
I need to see the specifics of that Daemon Prince formation, but from the rumors it doesn't look all that great (cuz Daemon Princes are still inferior to the Greater Daemons in terms of surviving). It would give me an excuse to use all 4 of my Greater Daemon models in the same list though. I'd just have to magnetize wings on the GUO & KoS to be playable Daemon Princes of Nurgle and Slaanesh respectively.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/02/12 17:58:24
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/12 18:36:19
Subject: Where/how/when All the new Daemon rules?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Galef wrote:I need to see the specifics of that Daemon Prince formation, but from the rumors it doesn't look all that great (cuz Daemon Princes are still inferior to the Greater Daemons in terms of surviving). It would give me an excuse to use all 4 of my Greater Daemon models in the same list though. I'd just have to magnetize wings on the GUO & KoS to be playable Daemon Princes of Nurgle and Slaanesh respectively.
I'm in the same boat (my Gds have pinned wings, thinking ahead)
Whilst they are all alive, they gets +1 T +1 S and re roll `1s to hit. They also all share one warlord trait. Luck of the draw, but that includes stuff like +1T or +1 inv save. They've still princes, but.. fun
|
DFTT |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/02/12 18:45:31
Subject: Where/how/when All the new Daemon rules?
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
Yeah the +1T is great, but I hate that you lose it if 1 of them dies. If you only needed 2 alive to get that bonus, I would SO be trying that out.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|