Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/02 03:46:49
Subject: Vanquisher vs. Battle Cannon
|
 |
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
Stats:
Battle Cannon Heavy d6 S8 AP -2 D d3
Vanquisher Heavy 1 S8 AP -3 D 2d6 take the highest
Assuming the target is T 8 armor 4+
We will assume 3 tanks firing as BS 3+
Battle cannon: 10.5*.66*.5*.825*2=5.7
Vanquisher: 3*.66*.5*4.5=4.4
Is it me or should the vanquisher be S9 at least?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/02 04:38:36
Subject: Vanquisher vs. Battle Cannon
|
 |
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
|
Check on 3+ armor. That's more common.
|
Clocks for the clockmaker! Cogs for the cog throne! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/02 17:42:58
Subject: Vanquisher vs. Battle Cannon
|
 |
Ship's Officer
London
|
The battle annon does seem better in basically all situations. I think those are worth spamming.
The gun that does look quite good, if looking for an alternative, is the punisher. In fact a Pasquisher might still be a great option for tearing up infantry.
It looks to me like the basic leman russ will be a seriously solid option all round. I think it comes to 184 points with a stubber on top, a lascannon and a couple of heavy Bolger's. That's pretty reasonable.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/02 18:30:02
Subject: Vanquisher vs. Battle Cannon
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
Advantage still on battle cannon.
Though genestealer cult has S9 vanquisher. That helps them a bit.
|
2024 painted/bought: 109/109 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/02 18:44:25
Subject: Vanquisher vs. Battle Cannon
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
It's probably a typo and it should be S9.
That said, that would only make a difference vs. T8 vehicles, which are not very common.
One down side of the current wound system is that S9-10 really matters little, particularly for one-shot weapon.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/06/02 18:46:33
Mr Vetock, give back my Multi-tracker! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/02 18:45:43
Subject: Vanquisher vs. Battle Cannon
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
Manchester, UK
|
tneva82 wrote:Though genestealer cult has S9 vanquisher. That helps them a bit.
Bloody Xenos stole all the good ammo to make up for the pain they felt from beast-hunter shells.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/02 23:14:12
Subject: Vanquisher vs. Battle Cannon
|
 |
Tail Gunner
|
They're both mediocre when it comes to damage per point. If you your aim is to destroy vehicles and MCs take the 6 lascannon/missile launcher HWS that you can get for the price of one battlecannon Russ and then bulk up on quad-plasma scions.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/06/02 23:25:06
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/06/02 23:28:01
Subject: Vanquisher vs. Battle Cannon
|
 |
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard
UK
|
Trickstick wrote:tneva82 wrote:Though genestealer cult has S9 vanquisher. That helps them a bit.
Bloody Xenos stole all the good ammo to make up for the pain they felt from beast-hunter shells.
You can't trust bald people, not like hair squigs are hard to find.
|
|
 |
 |
|