Daemonhosts and Jokaero Weaponsmiths

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**vipoid**

What are people's thoughts on Daemonhosts and Jokaero Weaponsmiths?

They seem interesting and not too expensive, but they're also fairly fragile single-models without character status and just a 5++ to protect them.

Are either of them any good?

**Silentz**

Trash, to be honest. Disappointingly bad!

They've always been expensive, and remain so. They've lost their lascannon/heavy flamer options

They don't even have the Quarry/Authority rules that the other Inquisition units have so can't get in a transport at all.

**vipoid**

I take it the same applies to demonhosts?

**GAdvance**

Daemonhosts at least could be a useful throwaway, single model unit that costs nothing, probably won't but could do serious damage and are easy for an opponent to forget.

I doubt they're competitive but i think they could occasionally cause a nuisance enough to flip close games

**Fan67**

They continue killing my jokaero army list.
50 jokaero and coteaz in 6ed was not only fun but quite viable list.

In 7ed it was almost trash. Now (and after Imperial Agents book) it is just imposible to field them en masse.

Very very sad.