Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/10 23:18:05
Subject: Necrons?
|
 |
Powerful Ushbati
|
Are these legitimate? If so, thoughts?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/10 23:35:43
Subject: Necrons?
|
 |
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
No one knows for now, try waiting a few days. Assuming GW will start talking about necrons, that is.
|
What I have
~4100
~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/10 23:36:56
Subject: Necrons?
|
 |
Powerful Ushbati
|
CthuluIsSpy wrote:No one knows for now, try waiting a few days. Assuming GW will start talking about necrons, that is.
I am skeptical, there is no mention of <dynasty> the same way we see <chapter>, <regiment>, <craftworld>, <sept> mentioned.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 00:19:36
Subject: Necrons?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Great point there Togusa. I missed that.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 01:09:00
Subject: Necrons?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Togusa wrote:I am skeptical, there is no mention of <dynasty> the same way we see <chapter>, <regiment>, <craftworld>, <sept> mentioned.
May I inquire where you see <sept> here?
The Necron wording is identical to WC Tau bits...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 01:11:32
Subject: Necrons?
|
 |
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel
|
Would people be happy with this, if this was real? I mean it would mean Necrons are now faster than orks...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 01:14:36
Subject: Necrons?
|
 |
Dangerous Skeleton Champion
|
It looks like the second page of the dynasty part, that's why not all the information is there. It looks legit to me. Same font and it even has artwork. As far as the traits go, there are some strong ones there.
|
Necrons
Imperial Knights
Orcs and Goblins
Tomb Kings
Wood Elves
High Elves |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 01:36:12
Subject: Necrons?
|
 |
Powerful Ushbati
|
Irbis wrote: Togusa wrote:I am skeptical, there is no mention of <dynasty> the same way we see <chapter>, <regiment>, <craftworld>, <sept> mentioned.
May I inquire where you see <sept> here?
The Necron wording is identical to WC Tau bits...
You are right, most of my stuff is index so that may be where my confusion came from.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 01:40:40
Subject: Necrons?
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 01:40:52
Subject: Necrons?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Well, early Codex entries had that format, but from what I see, Chaos Daemons were last to do that. Maybe because you have multiple keywords in CD army, and in SM case, the trait doesn't apply to everything so you need to have keywords specified, but latest books just say tenet/code/whatever and apply to everything...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/03/11 02:10:57
Subject: Necrons?
|
 |
[DCM]
Sentient OverBear
|
This is a duplicate thread. Ghaz linked to the original thread with this information.
|
DQ:70S++G+++M+B++I+Pw40k94+ID+++A++/sWD178R+++T(I)DM+++
Trust me, no matter what damage they have the potential to do, single-shot weapons always flatter to deceive in 40k. Rule #1 - BBAP
|
|
 |
 |
|