| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2018/04/09 08:35:07
Subject: Can a unit that has fallen back claim an objective?
|
|
Infiltrating Broodlord
New York
|
I can't seem to find it in the rules, but this has been brought up to my attention:
Can a unit that has fallen back claim an objective?
Do they count for the purposes of determining the number of models on an objective? (Let's say each player has 1 model within 3" of objective. Then player A falls back with a nearby model and moves within 3" of this objective, does that player now hold the objective since he has 2 models to 1 near it)
|
1. Tyranids - 15,000 pts
2. Chaos Space Marines - 7,100 pts
3. Space Marines - 6,000 pts
4. Orks - 5,900 pts
5. Dark Angels - 4,300 pts
6. Necrons - 4,600 pts
7. Grey Knights - 3,200 pts
8. Eldar - 3,400 pts
9. Blood Angels - 3,200 pts
10. Chaos Daemons - 3,200 pts
11. Tau Empire - 3,000 pts
12. Space Wolves - 2,400 pts |
|
|
 |
|
2018/04/09 09:03:54
Subject: Can a unit that has fallen back claim an objective?
|
|
Fireknife Shas'el
Lisbon, Portugal
|
As far as I know, there's nothing prohibiting falling back units from claiming objectives.
Fall Back from 8th != Fall Back from 7th. In 8th, it's a strategic move to allow your units to shoot at the previously charging unit. In 7th, it was a result of a morale test that you failed and didn't have the unit wiped out.
|
AI & BFG:  / BMG: Mr. Freeze, Deathstroke / Battletech: SR, OWA / Fallout Factions: BoS / HGB: Caprice / Malifaux: Arcanists, Guild, Outcasts / MCP: Mutants / SAGA: Ordensstaat / SW Legion: CIS / WWX: Union
 Unit1126PLL wrote:"FW is unbalanced and going to ruin tournaments."
"Name one where it did that."
"IT JUST DOES OKAY!"
 Shadenuat wrote:Voted Astra Militarum for a chance for them to get nerfed instead of my own army.
|
|
|
|
|
2018/04/09 11:44:46
Subject: Can a unit that has fallen back claim an objective?
|
|
Norn Queen
|
 Akaiyou wrote:I can't seem to find it in the rules, but this has been brought up to my attention:
Can a unit that has fallen back claim an objective?
Do they count for the purposes of determining the number of models on an objective? (Let's say each player has 1 model within 3" of objective. Then player A falls back with a nearby model and moves within 3" of this objective, does that player now hold the objective since he has 2 models to 1 near it)
Yes it can. Nothing says otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
2018/04/09 15:12:17
Subject: Re:Can a unit that has fallen back claim an objective?
|
|
Deathwing Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
Claiming an objective only deals with how many models are near the said objective.
Falling back does not prohibit you from counting the models that have fallen back towards that said unit count.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
