Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Not a huge fan of the way they did them. Simple yes, but loses a bit.

I've redone the datasheets to put the phantom between a reaver and a warlord pointswise, as that's at minimum where it should sit.

SImilarly the revenant has always been between the warhound and reaver so it got a slight boost with the holofield rule.


I've also added the warlock titan because it's cool and I wish they'd do one.



I have an idea for imperial titans to make them function more like they used to which I'll post later.

This is what I'm thinking for imperial titans, specifically void shields.

This is inspired by the silent king's menhirs. it means they have no invulnerable save, but you get to waste excess damage on a shield rather than it going through to the titan itself. Unsure if it will work the way I think it does, but the idea is that the enemy targets the unit and wastes their attacks on the shields, even if they only have 1 wound left.

traditionally the number of void shields went:

warhound 2
Reaver 4
Warlord 6

And while any were still functioning, you could bring the others back up, but if they were completely offlined, then you were more vulnerable.

The belicosa won't be able to one shot a warlord on the first turn with these rules.