Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Human-sized boltguns would remain S4.

I think I like them. Seems like your goal is to take a step towards Movie Marines without going full Movie Marine, yeah?

Some nitpicks:
* Not sure how I feel about M8". I get that you want to show them being faster than normal humans, but this also makes them faster than most eldar. But that's a small thing.

* Not sure about DW on the bolters. It's not that I think DW makes them too strong. It's just that I'm not sure it really reflects the lore very well. Bolters aren't particularly good at ignoring terminator armor or bypassing invulnerable saves, you know?

* By making things BS2+, you create some non-interactivity with your heavy weapons. Unless your opponent actively has some sort of to-hit penalty in place, you never have a reason to actually use the heavy rule on your stalker bolter or heavy bolter.

* I'm surprised you didn't update any other weapon profiles. A flamer/hand flamer is a harder sell when you have S5, AP-1, D2 with DW baked in. Similarly, the math on a plasma gun probably still favors a plasma gun, but not as much as you'd think when the bolter hits on a 2+ but the plasma hits on a 3+. Any plans to update the other weapons?

* You made your chainsword straight up worse than your power sword. While you're designing weapons, you may as well try to give each of them a niche. The simple fix is probably to give the chainsword more attacks. Possibly at AP0 if you're worried about those extra attacks making it too good into more heavily armored targets.

* I like this version of combi-weapons. Could be a little heavy on the bookkeeping if you could take a bunch of them per squad, but that's not a problem here.

Mechanically? They feel a little cheap. That's a lot of power in 30 points.

Thematically? It feels Bolter Porny.

Marines are currently four times as durable as a Guard infantry-twice the wounds, half damage taken against AP0. Obviously they get worse as damage increases and somewhat worse as AP increases, but you need a weapon that's S8, AP-4 (-5 in Cover), and D2 or better to make a Marine equal a Guardsman.
They're also better at shooting, better at close combat, so on and so forth.

With this change, you'd need a weapon that's S8 or better (no change), AP-5 (-6 in Cover) or better, and D3 or better to make the Marine die as quickly as a Guard. And that feels excessive.

A Plasma Gun normally kills GEQ on a 2+ to-wound, and kills MEQ on a 2+ to-wound, 6+ to-save. That makes Marines only a little hardier against a powerful gun, though Plasma toters can fire more safely upon GEQ because they don't need to overcharge. 20% more durable, to be exact. (50% if they get cover and you overcharge against GEQ.)
With your MEQ... Hits the same. Wounds the same. Saves on a 5+ (4+ in cover). Needs two failed saves to kill.
That makes them three to four times as durable to Plasma.

It just feels too much. Or, I guess, what would you do for, say, Plaguebearers? Custodian Guard? Scions? Genestealers?