Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/25 20:28:18
Subject: Dwarven Mountain Holds or High Elves
|
 |
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout
|
Hey guys!!
I've been dabbling in Warhammer the old world for about 8 months or so. I'm really struggling to decide between these two armies. I love the more mainly of both armies, the aesthetic, everything. So I guess it comes down to gameplay?
I'm not really think what's stronger, but what do you think would be more fun? The whole "Build a bear" mechanic for runes looks really interesting but I don't know how much longevity it would have, and obviously the high elves have just been teased. But as it stands, which do you guys prefer to see on the other end of the board!
Cheers
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/25 20:49:18
Subject: Re:Dwarven Mountain Holds or High Elves
|
 |
Servoarm Flailing Magos
On the Surface of the Sun aka Florida in the Summer.
|
I'm going to say High Elves, because they look like you could do a lot more with them. And if they are anything like they used to play, the magic was super fun.
The Dwarves were kinda samey... all the builds I've seen seem to be... well... the same.
I've never played as them, so take it with a grain of  .
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2025/01/25 20:52:08
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/27 05:36:38
Subject: Dwarven Mountain Holds or High Elves
|
 |
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker
Dallas, Tx
|
My vote goes for high elves too, especially since they are on the verge of a new release. Dwarves are too slow and high elves can participate in all phases of the game (movement, magic, shooting, and combat).
|
ToW armies I own:
Empire: 10,000+
Chaos Legions: DoC- 10,000+; WoC- 7,500+; Beastmen- 2,500+; Chaos Dwarves- 3,500+
Unaligned: Ogres- 2,500; Tomb Kings- 3,000
Hotek: Dark Elves- 7,500+; High Elves- 2,500
40k armies I own:
CSM- 25,000+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/01/28 20:02:32
Subject: Dwarven Mountain Holds or High Elves
|
 |
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker
Dallas, Tx
|
In terms of customization, both armies have that with maybe dwarves having a bit more because of runes. But Old World differs greatly from 40K (in its current form) in how much you can tinker with your army list. Not power level like 10ed 40K. Ultimately pick the army you like the best in terms of aesthetics since you’ll be painting/assembling it and that’s important to get through that.
|
ToW armies I own:
Empire: 10,000+
Chaos Legions: DoC- 10,000+; WoC- 7,500+; Beastmen- 2,500+; Chaos Dwarves- 3,500+
Unaligned: Ogres- 2,500; Tomb Kings- 3,000
Hotek: Dark Elves- 7,500+; High Elves- 2,500
40k armies I own:
CSM- 25,000+ |
|
 |
 |
|