| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2026/06/17 17:56:45
Subject: Within 9"
|
 |
Winged Kroot Vulture
|
Something interesting I just noticed when doing some mathhammer.
The new rules say the entire squad must be withing 9" of everyone else in the squad. If you have 10 models on 28.5mm bases, and line them up touching each other in a straight line, the furthest 2 models from each other will be 8.976376" apart, just a hairs breadth inside the acceptable threshold.
Should be an easy way to place squads in a line if needed without fiddley measuring all the time.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2026/06/17 19:00:22
Subject: Within 9"
|
 |
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar
|
Tawnis wrote:Something interesting I just noticed when doing some mathhammer.
The new rules say the entire squad must be withing 9" of everyone else in the squad. If you have 10 models on 28.5mm bases, and line them up touching each other in a straight line, the furthest 2 models from each other will be 8.976376" apart, just a hairs breadth inside the acceptable threshold.
Should be an easy way to place squads in a line if needed without fiddley measuring all the time.
Forgive me, but how?
10 x 28.5mm is 285mm, so, 28.5cm. 28.5cm is just over 11 inches?
|
They/them
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2026/06/17 19:11:25
Subject: Within 9"
|
 |
Morbid Black Knight
|
Sgt_Smudge wrote: Tawnis wrote:Something interesting I just noticed when doing some mathhammer.
The new rules say the entire squad must be withing 9" of everyone else in the squad. If you have 10 models on 28.5mm bases, and line them up touching each other in a straight line, the furthest 2 models from each other will be 8.976376" apart, just a hairs breadth inside the acceptable threshold.
Should be an easy way to place squads in a line if needed without fiddley measuring all the time.
Forgive me, but how?
10 x 28.5mm is 285mm, so, 28.5cm. 28.5cm is just over 11 inches?
Remember you measure between closest point. So you actually only have to fit 8 bases inside the 9" conga line, as 99.99% of the bases on the ends can 'overhang'.
Eight 28.5mm bases are 8.97637795 wide
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2026/06/17 19:11:43
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2026/06/17 20:16:18
Subject: Within 9"
|
 |
Winged Kroot Vulture
|
Exactly, because it's within and not wholly within.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2026/06/18 13:41:39
Subject: Re:Within 9"
|
 |
Pious Palatine
|
That's interesting and makes you wonder if GW actually did the math when they decided on the rule? You can have your unit of 10 Space Marines in a line, but your 20-model squad needs to create a second rank.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2026/06/18 14:53:17
Subject: Within 9"
|
 |
Morbid Black Knight
|
10 Space Marines couldn't fit in a line, it'd have to be a wiggly/staggered line at best.
Personally I very much doubt GW specifically lined up 10 28.5mm bases to determine the range.
If nothing else stringing a unit out in a base-base line just isn't much of a thing in 40k.
I think 9" is just the "about right" for the footprint of a unit. Plus it's a rounder number than 8" or 10".
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2026/06/18 15:33:45
Subject: Within 9"
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I just wish it was 8" so the same stick could be used for Deep Strikes
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2026/06/18 16:13:21
Subject: Within 9"
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
kirotheavenger wrote:I think 9" is just the "about right" for the footprint of a unit. Plus it's a rounder number than 8" or 10".
I'm fairly sure 8 is could be argued to be rounder than 9, and 9 is definitely not rounder than the 0 in 10...
You can maybe make an argument for it being 3/4 of a foot, but it's still a weird number to pick - especially given the minimum board sizes are no longer in multiples of a foot.
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
The Encounter Deck - a long-form gaming podcast.
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he wants Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2026/06/18 22:31:32
Subject: Within 9"
|
 |
Morbid Black Knight
|
Dysartes wrote: kirotheavenger wrote:I think 9" is just the "about right" for the footprint of a unit. Plus it's a rounder number than 8" or 10".
I'm fairly sure 8 is could be argued to be rounder than 9, and 9 is definitely not rounder than the 0 in 10...
You can maybe make an argument for it being 3/4 of a foot, but it's still a weird number to pick - especially given the minimum board sizes are no longer in multiples of a foot.
What hookie decimal system are you using son?
This is metric, we use base 12. 9" is three quarters of a foot - the King's own measurement!
Board sizes may not be multiples of a foot, but every other measurement in the game is, usually multiples of 6 inches
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|