Switch Theme:

The world in 2067?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar





Mario wrote:
Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:That is fething insane. Do you WANT an Orwellian dystopia? Because that is how you get an Orwellian dystopia.
Yeah, about that: https://www.theguardian.com/media/pda/2010/sep/27/advertising-billboards-facial-recognition-japan

There was also recently an article about some digital billboard that crashed and people could identify bits and pieces of the facial recognition code (Sweden, I think?)


Yes, and? I find these billboards worrying.

I don't think the claim was that it'll be positive for society,


 legoburner wrote:
It will be a big net positive for society as a whole...

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/11/13 00:10:18


 
   
Made in au
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak





 Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:
I reject your claim that it will be a net positive for society. It will be an authoritarian nightmare that will hand over complete control of society to Governments.


Even worse than that, it will hand control of society to angry internet mobs. At least authoritarian governments tend to tire of pointless, ideological cruelty within a few years and just settle down to only oppressing people to protect their power and privilege. But with this plan there will always be a new crop of enthusiastic amateurs ready to prove their own virtue by destroying some person who said or did something wrong.

“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”

Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. 
   
Made in de
Longtime Dakkanaut




Shadow Captain Edithae: About the legoburner quote you quoted just now. That was nested three deep. I though you were replying to the quoted part directly above and that legoburner quote read to me more along the lines of "it's unavoidable", not necessarily positive (I hadn't even looked at the other two quotes two or three layers deep in that quote but didn't want to mess the quotes up too much by deleting even more stuff). I hope that makes sense.

That's also why I quoted your other quote separately (with the multiquote feature). Yes, those billboards are worrying. I was just trying to show that this stuff has been already invisibly creeping into our lives without us knowing or expecting it. The Orwellian dystopia that you fear is coming has just parked and already started unloading its tech. Your warning is too late.
   
Made in us
Did Fulgrim Just Behead Ferrus?





Fort Worth, TX

 sebster wrote:
 Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:
I reject your claim that it will be a net positive for society. It will be an authoritarian nightmare that will hand over complete control of society to Governments.


Even worse than that, it will hand control of society to angry internet mobs. At least authoritarian governments tend to tire of pointless, ideological cruelty within a few years and just settle down to only oppressing people to protect their power and privilege. But with this plan there will always be a new crop of enthusiastic amateurs ready to prove their own virtue by destroying some person who said or did something wrong.


Um, aren't we already at the point where an "angry internet mob" can destroy someone's public life just because they don't like something person has said/done?

"Through the darkness of future past, the magician longs to see.
One chants out between two worlds: Fire, walk with me."
- Twin Peaks
"You listen to me. While I will admit to a certain cynicism, the fact is that I am a naysayer and hatchetman in the fight against violence. I pride myself in taking a punch and I'll gladly take another because I choose to live my life in the company of Gandhi and King. My concerns are global. I reject absolutely revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method... is love. I love you Sheriff Truman." - Twin Peaks 
   
Made in gb
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar





 Tannhauser42 wrote:
 sebster wrote:
 Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:
I reject your claim that it will be a net positive for society. It will be an authoritarian nightmare that will hand over complete control of society to Governments.


Even worse than that, it will hand control of society to angry internet mobs. At least authoritarian governments tend to tire of pointless, ideological cruelty within a few years and just settle down to only oppressing people to protect their power and privilege. But with this plan there will always be a new crop of enthusiastic amateurs ready to prove their own virtue by destroying some person who said or did something wrong.


Um, aren't we already at the point where an "angry internet mob" can destroy someone's public life just because they don't like something person has said/done?


Yes but this will hand them a powerful weapon.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/11/13 23:52:21


 
   
Made in au
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak





 Tannhauser42 wrote:
Um, aren't we already at the point where an "angry internet mob" can destroy someone's public life just because they don't like something person has said/done?


That's the point. We're at the point where it can happen and does happen sometimes. This will be giving the process government and social sanction, it will make it happen constantly. Imagine China's Cultural Revolution, but the fethers won't even have to get out of their chairs to destroy someone's life.

“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”

Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. 
   
Made in au
Liche Priest Hierophant







 Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:
 Tannhauser42 wrote:
 sebster wrote:
 Shadow Captain Edithae wrote:
I reject your claim that it will be a net positive for society. It will be an authoritarian nightmare that will hand over complete control of society to Governments.


Even worse than that, it will hand control of society to angry internet mobs. At least authoritarian governments tend to tire of pointless, ideological cruelty within a few years and just settle down to only oppressing people to protect their power and privilege. But with this plan there will always be a new crop of enthusiastic amateurs ready to prove their own virtue by destroying some person who said or did something wrong.


Um, aren't we already at the point where an "angry internet mob" can destroy someone's public life just because they don't like something person has said/done?


Yes but this will hand them a powerful weapon.


I can't wait to be a part of that one episode of The Orville for real.
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: