Switch Theme:

Why is GW more liberal about equipment customization in HH than it is in 40k?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Ridin' on a Snotling Pump Wagon






The one where the Farseers had near identical loadout, including two Fixed Field Saves, but that had recently been FAQ’d as a no-no, but given both players derived the same advantage, it was allowed for that game?

With the Unicorns painted on the jetbike cowlings?

   
Made in us
Ultramarine Chaplain with Hate to Spare






 Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:
The one where the Farseers had near identical loadout, including two Fixed Field Saves, but that had recently been FAQ’d as a no-no, but given both players derived the same advantage, it was allowed for that game?

With the Unicorns painted on the jetbike cowlings?
I dunno, I'd have to find it and check. But I'd believe both assertions.

And They Shall Not Fit Through Doors!!!

Tyranid Army Progress -- With Classic Warriors!:
https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/743240.page#9671598 
   
Made in pl
Fixture of Dakka




 Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:
The one where the Farseers had near identical loadout, including two Fixed Field Saves, but that had recently been FAQ’d as a no-no, but given both players derived the same advantage, it was allowed for that game?

With the Unicorns painted on the jetbike cowlings?


Wait was that the one where the GT winner with the more powerful army, and who won the game too, claimed to have more fluffy and lore accurate eldar army, because his guardians only had half their squads armed with shurikan catapults, while his GW oppponent, was using zero squads not armed with them? If that is the report then it is legendary, because it is/was told as a story to new players in 8th ed, when I started. Mostly as a guide to "what to expect playing vs eldar players".

If you have to kill, then kill in the best manner. If you slaughter, then slaughter in the best manner. Let one of you sharpen his knife so his animal feels no pain. 
   
Made in gb
Ridin' on a Snotling Pump Wagon






In 2nd Ed, only half your Guardian Squads could have Shuriken Catapults, and they came with Lasguns as standard.

However, you could kinda game that system. See, Jetbikes were a squad upgrade to Guardians, and those came with twin linked Shuriken Catapults (which, under 2nd Ed rules, on to hit roll, if successful both hit). And those counted as a Lasgun equipped Guardian squad.

So, if I had four Guardian squads? Two could have Shuriken Catapults, two would have to carry Lasguns.

But, there’s nothing stopping me dipping into another pouch of points to equip the Lasgun Guardians with Jetbikes.

The net result is I’ve completely followed the rules, not even slightly bending them, but all my Guardians have Shuriken Catapults.

Even if I didn’t do that? It’s half the squads, not half the total number of Guardians in my force. So I could have four squads.

Two are ten strong, and I buy them Shuriken Catapults. The other two are five strong, and have Lasguns.

Now was that argued in that battle report? I honestly don’t recall.

   
Made in fr
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot





France

 Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:
In 2nd Ed, only half your Guardian Squads could have Shuriken Catapults, and they came with Lasguns as standard.

However, you could kinda game that system. See, Jetbikes were a squad upgrade to Guardians, and those came with twin linked Shuriken Catapults (which, under 2nd Ed rules, on to hit roll, if successful both hit). And those counted as a Lasgun equipped Guardian squad.

So, if I had four Guardian squads? Two could have Shuriken Catapults, two would have to carry Lasguns.

But, there’s nothing stopping me dipping into another pouch of points to equip the Lasgun Guardians with Jetbikes.

The net result is I’ve completely followed the rules, not even slightly bending them, but all my Guardians have Shuriken Catapults.

Even if I didn’t do that? It’s half the squads, not half the total number of Guardians in my force. So I could have four squads.

Two are ten strong, and I buy them Shuriken Catapults. The other two are five strong, and have Lasguns.

Now was that argued in that battle report? I honestly don’t recall.


you my not have bent the rules doc, but you just bent my mind

40k: Necrons/Imperial Guard/ Space marines
Bolt Action: Germany/ USA
Project Z.

"The Dakka Dive Bar is the only place you'll hear what's really going on in the underhive. Sure you might not find a good amasec but they grill a mean groxburger. Just watch for ratlings being thrown through windows and you'll be alright." Ciaphas Cain, probably.  
   
 
Forum Index » The Horus Heresy
Go to: