Switch Theme:

Skimmers, vectored engines, glancing hits.  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Abhorrent Grotesque Aberration





The question is this. If an Eldar skimmer is moving over 6" all hits against it are counted as glancing. If this skimmer is shot down, but saved due to vectored engines, are further hits considered glancing or not automatically?

The one part of the skimmer glancing rule that makes me wonder is this: "Any hit that beats the armour value of a mobile skimmer moving more than 6" in it's last movement phase counts as glancing hits instead of penetrating hits."

This to me seems to imply that the skimmer has to still be mobile, which if it has been immobilized would make it no longer mobile so all other shots fired at it during that turn should be able to penetrate. Thoughts?

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die. 
   
Made in us
Stealthy Dark Angels Scout with Shotgun





Well, I think the key part here is the word "mobile". Correct me if I am wrong, as I dont have the new Eldar Codex yet, but the vectored engines basically prevent it from being destroyed when its imobilized while moving, right? If so, then it would no long be mobile and therefore not qualify for the glancing hits rule. Hope that helps.
   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

Seems to me that you're on the right track.

'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in us
Abhorrent Grotesque Aberration





That is what I thought. Mobile is the key word, and if it isn't mobile, it can't benefit from the skimmer glance rule. I saw mention of this in the Yakfaq, but no answer or explanation. Just a question to be asked.

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die. 
   
Made in us
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Los Angeles, CA


I removed it because it is answered by the skimmers moving fast rule you quoted yourself: only mobile skimmers may gain the skimmers moving fast benefit.


I play (click on icons to see pics): DQ:70+S++G(FAQ)M++B-I++Pw40k92/f-D+++A+++/areWD104R+T(D)DM+++
yakface's 40K rule #1: Although the rules allow you to use modeling to your advantage, how badly do you need to win your toy soldier games?
yakface's 40K rule #2: Friends don't let friends start a MEQ army.
yakface's 40K rule #3: Codex does not ALWAYS trump the rulebook, so please don't say that!
Waaagh Dakka: click the banner to learn more! 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran





The way I ahve been playing this, as an eldar player in the LA area, is that any shots that are part of the same batch (ie all from one unit) or CC attacks at the same initiative step resolve as if it were mobile, but subsequent shooting batched/initiative steps in the same turn resolve as if against an immobile vehicle. Its pretty much the least confusing and fair way to handle it.

Example-1:
Blue Marine unit of five man las plas variety rolls two hits on a Wave Serpent with totals of 12 and 13 on the armor penetrations. Both hits are resolved as glances, even if the first one rolls imobilize. If it is immobilized, then the next 5 man las/plas unit can penetrate it normally, as if it were an immobile rhino.

Example-2:
Assault Squad with melta bombs and a power fist assaults a Wave Serpent. If one of the meltabomb guys manages to immobilize the Wave Serpent at initiative 4, then all the other bombs at that same initiative step still resolve as if against a mobile fast skimmer (6 to hit, only glance), but when initiative 1 rolls around, the power fist resolves against the tank as an immobile vehicle (auto hit, can be penetrated).
   
Made in us
Abhorrent Grotesque Aberration





Yep, that was my thought exactly.

Thanks Yak, I saw it referenced in old parts of the board, but didn't see it in your current FAQ, so I had to ask

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die. 
   
Made in us
Stealthy Dark Angels Scout with Shotgun





Posted By Phazael on 02/26/2007 1:13 PM
The way I ahve been playing this, as an eldar player in the LA area, is that any shots that are part of the same batch (ie all from one unit) or CC attacks at the same initiative step resolve as if it were mobile, but subsequent shooting batched/initiative steps in the same turn resolve as if against an immobile vehicle. Its pretty much the least confusing and fair way to handle it.

Example-1:
Blue Marine unit of five man las plas variety rolls two hits on a Wave Serpent with totals of 12 and 13 on the armor penetrations. Both hits are resolved as glances, even if the first one rolls imobilize. If it is immobilized, then the next 5 man las/plas unit can penetrate it normally, as if it were an immobile rhino.

Example-2:
Assault Squad with melta bombs and a power fist assaults a Wave Serpent. If one of the meltabomb guys manages to immobilize the Wave Serpent at initiative 4, then all the other bombs at that same initiative step still resolve as if against a mobile fast skimmer (6 to hit, only glance), but when initiative 1 rolls around, the power fist resolves against the tank as an immobile vehicle (auto hit, can be penetrated).

This sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut



Mi.

I dont think anyone even a GW employee would say differantly.


The only easy day was yesterday.  
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran




the spire of angels

unless they FAQ it differently it seems pretty reasonable since other skimmers would simply be destroyed. this wy it becomes a pillbox with al the nifty eldar equipment.

"victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none" 
   
Made in us
Plastictrees






Salem, MA

It appears clear to me from the phrasing of the rule, but I still encounter some resistance to the idea in actual gameplay. Old habits die hard.

"The complete or partial destruction of the enemy must be regarded as the sole object of all engagements.... Direct annihilation of the enemy's forces must always be the dominant consideration." Karl von Clausewitz 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: