Switch Theme:

Fighta/Fighta-Bommer question  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Storm Trooper with Maglight



Milwaukee, WI

I was thinking about making an Ork Airfield/Aerodrome/whatever. What would an appropriate runway length for Ork Fightas and/or Fighta-Bommers be (in real-world feet)?

There doesn't seem to be any information in the IA books or in Deff Swadron so I guess this is a matter for debate. The Fighta looks to be an Orked MiG-15/17/19/21 (with a different tail assembly obviously) and the Fighta-Bommer looks something like a jet-version of an Orked Bf-110 so those might be starting points but I have to assume that Orks would use a fairly extreme version of Rocket Assisted Take Off so I'm really not sure where to start.

Any help would be much appreciated. There isn't going to be a single right answer clearly. Even in the meta-reality of 40k I'd have to assume that take offs and especially landings among Orks would be more art than science.

This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2008/02/13 18:40:22


18th Gamtilla Secundus Dragoon Guards Regiment: “The Lord Governor’s Own” 
   
Made in gb
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'





Spreading the word of the Turtle Pie

These are orks. Why bother with runways?

   
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: