Switch Theme:

Old School Painting Challenge: Celestial Lions Captain  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Ruthless Rafkin






Glen Burnie, MD



I saw some good commentary on other threads, so I thought I'd throw my captain out there for C&C as well.

Where did I do well, and what could I have done better?



-Loki- wrote:
40k is about slamming two slegdehammers together and hoping the other breaks first. Malifaux is about fighting with scalpels trying to hit select areas and hoping you connect more. 
   
Made in pt
Sinewy Scourge





Porto

Hmmm, where did I think you go wrong... First of all, I love that miniature. It's side by side with the old Dark Angels Captain (too bad the UM one doesn't get remade, too). But in this case, I think the paint looks a bit thick-ish. The red could be used on the pistol, but I think you should have been more bold on the sword holster and the hair.

For me, it's more like... you managed to get a good solid base (would be better if the coats were thinners - or is the model textured? Could be that the metal is no longer "flat", from being old) but I think you didn't highlight it enough, or rather, you didn't get it to shine... But inverting some of the colours of the UM 'Eavy Metal mini was a good step. But the "black lining" just doesn't look even (his forehead) and some of the metal is a bit undetailed (the part where the hair stands).

I thought it was a good entry (sorry to say that I think I've seen an older post from you and I wasn't impressed by your minis, but this one seems a lot better than I could remember - hope you don't take it as an insult!) but ultimately it lacked some "shine" to it, something to catch the eye. You could've also painted the eyes like you paint gems, it would have given a focal point and that's what I think the miniature is missing.

Good work none-the-less!

anonymous @ best Warhammer Miniature wrote:i vote the choas dwarf lord as they are the greatest dwarfs n should get there own codex


 
   
Made in us
Ruthless Rafkin






Glen Burnie, MD

Destrado wrote:Hmmm, where did I think you go wrong... First of all, I love that miniature. It's side by side with the old Dark Angels Captain (too bad the UM one doesn't get remade, too). But in this case, I think the paint looks a bit thick-ish. The red could be used on the pistol, but I think you should have been more bold on the sword holster and the hair.

For me, it's more like... you managed to get a good solid base (would be better if the coats were thinners - or is the model textured? Could be that the metal is no longer "flat", from being old) but I think you didn't highlight it enough, or rather, you didn't get it to shine... But inverting some of the colours of the UM 'Eavy Metal mini was a good step. But the "black lining" just doesn't look even (his forehead) and some of the metal is a bit undetailed (the part where the hair stands).

I thought it was a good entry (sorry to say that I think I've seen an older post from you and I wasn't impressed by your minis, but this one seems a lot better than I could remember - hope you don't take it as an insult!) but ultimately it lacked some "shine" to it, something to catch the eye. You could've also painted the eyes like you paint gems, it would have given a focal point and that's what I think the miniature is missing.

Good work none-the-less!


Thank you.

With regards to the paint thickness, I have to agree. I think it was working in metallics that caused a bit of the problem. If I thin metallics, the have no coverage. Given the current thickness, I was hesitant to take it up to a silver highligh. I knew I should have done more on the eyes as well.

As for the older post, I don't doubt it either. For basic troopers, I really just want to get them on the field. I'd like to say I'm more of a player than a painter, but my current record isn't allowing me to day that either...



-Loki- wrote:
40k is about slamming two slegdehammers together and hoping the other breaks first. Malifaux is about fighting with scalpels trying to hit select areas and hoping you connect more. 
   
Made in pt
Sinewy Scourge





Porto

Too bad about the troops, if they were painted to this guy's level they'd be looking great

And I hate mould lines too. I bought a Dire Avenger box a few months ago. I primed them yesterday... five of them. I hate flash.

anonymous @ best Warhammer Miniature wrote:i vote the choas dwarf lord as they are the greatest dwarfs n should get there own codex


 
   
 
Forum Index » Painting & Modeling
Go to: