| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2008/09/09 21:40:36
Subject: Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Impassive Inquisitorial Interrogator
|
I started playing d&d as soon as 4th came out with a group of my friends at the moment i have a 4th lvl human palidin, a 4th lvl eldrian wizard, and i would like to make a rouge now but on some of the rouges at will/encounter powers they say you need to have a melee weapon/light blade.
The dagger is classified as a light blade and it can be used as a light thrown so here is the question:
Can i throw the dagger at an enemy and still benifit from the at will power/encounter/daily that require a melee weapon?
As always thank you for any responses
|
 
This is silly! Buttons are not how one escapes dungeons! I would smash the button and rain beatings liberally down on the wizard for playing such a trick!
|
|
|
 |
|
2008/09/10 16:25:51
Subject: Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
No. If the power has the “melee” keyword, it only works on a melee attack, not a ranged attack.
|
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
|
|
|
2008/09/15 03:05:15
Subject: Re:Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Rouge=cosmetics women put on their cheeks
Rogue=thief
Just trying to help you out. You also might try ENWorld or RPG.net for D&D questions--there's a lot of people on those forums who play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008/09/15 04:06:57
Subject: Re:Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Wrack Sufferer
|
If the light weapon you throw is a magic one it comes back to you though.
|
Once upon a time, I told myself it's better to be smart than lucky. Every day, the world proves me wrong a little more. |
|
|
|
|
2009/01/05 13:09:15
Subject: Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Hooded Inquisitorial Interrogator
|
d&d whats that?
|
 i want to play and ride with you on your predator. i want to be friends with you
 too bad alien scum
arrrghhhhhhhhh *cuts off head of space marine*
dat was fun friend....friend??? friend!!!!
humph your not my friend any more *walks off to the predator* now for some fun!
i play as and  needs the new sm army codex!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
2009/02/03 22:55:06
Subject: Re:Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Wrack Sufferer
|
Threadomancy, in my Dakka?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/02/03 22:55:15
Once upon a time, I told myself it's better to be smart than lucky. Every day, the world proves me wrong a little more. |
|
|
|
|
2009/02/03 23:32:28
Subject: Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
4 days isn't threadnomancy. It's just plugging the life support back in. 
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/02/04 19:38:13
Subject: Re:Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Wicked Canoptek Wraith
united states of america state of: confusion
|
like my thread needs 
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/02/04 20:32:56
Subject: Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Well, I've been waiting for you to post the stuff you said you would. :p
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/02/05 13:11:39
Subject: Re:Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Wicked Canoptek Wraith
united states of america state of: confusion
|
sorry i havent had much time lately i've been caught up with my networking class and i'm entered in a AIA atlanta highschool student design contest for $2000 dollars in scholorship money so i've been woried about the contest more than anything right now because i want the scholarship to get into the university of wisconsin for architecture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/04/28 04:05:27
Subject: Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Stalwart Veteran Guard Sergeant
|
As someone earlier said, rouge is makeup, rogue is a guy in a cloak doing nefarious things.
Concerning your question, no. If the power in question is geared for thrown weapons, it'll be fairly obvious. I can't think of any powers off-hand, but they would mention "thrown weapons".
|
"I went into a hobby-shop to play m'self a game,
The 'ouse Guru 'e up an' sez "The Guard is weak and lame!"
The Chaos gits around the shelves they laughed and snickered in my face,
I outs into the street again an' grabbed my figure-case."
Oh it's "Angels this" an' "Space-wolves that", and "Guardsmen, go away!";
But it's "Thank you for the ordnance" when the Guard begins to play,
O it's "LOOK AT ALL THE ORDNANCE!" when the Guard begins to play.."
-Cadian XXIX (edited for length) |
|
|
|
|
2009/05/18 08:41:31
Subject: Re:Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche
|
gamefreak wrote:my dad used to play spell jammer
I grew 10 more grey hairs when I read that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/18 19:04:50
Subject: Re:Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Wicked Canoptek Wraith
united states of america state of: confusion
|
Why? Are you THAT old?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/19 06:44:47
Subject: Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche
|
How old is 'that old'?
I think Spelljammer came out my senior year of HS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/19 21:22:24
Subject: Re:Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Wicked Canoptek Wraith
united states of america state of: confusion
|
about 38 years old. sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/30 19:13:28
Subject: Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
LOL Spelljammer came out my freshman year of HS. You're a whippersnapper, gamefreak.
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/30 20:23:35
Subject: Re:Just a quick question about the rouge class for 4th edition D&D
|
|
Wicked Canoptek Wraith
united states of america state of: confusion
|
yes i know, i'm only 16. (that doesnt stop me from drinking though)
i'm currently a junior going into my senior year, so i am graduating early. lucky me! then i have 7 years of college
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
