Serious Question: Do you want me to re-upload my Space Wolf FAQ?

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Gwar!**

Please, No flaming. I just want to know what Dakka thinks. If they want it, I'll put it up.

**MinMax**

Hell, yeah!

I especially enjoyed that it was printed more quickly, and to a higher standard, than GW's own FAQs.

**Cheese Elemental**

I want it to be re-uploaded. It was well thought out and helpful to people at my FLGS.

**The Defenestrator**

I voted yes.

Worst case scenario; people disagree with you, get angry, and beat their wives. Best case; you make some people think.

Your FAQ is ultimately opinion in any case, and might help people some people think about Space Wolf FAQ issues in a different way. or won't. It certainly can't do any harm.

Domestic abuse aside, that is.

**Manimal**

Wow, go die in a fire? Some people really hated your faq.

**Orkeosaurus**

I voted Die in a Fire.

OP BETTER DELIVER IF WE WIN

PICS OR IT DIDNT HAPPEN

(But you might as well upload your FAQ before you do, I'm sure at least some people will find it useful.)

**starbomber109**

I'll vote for the re-upload as well. Just so long as you don't make yet another thread about it

(that goes for anyone else too for that matter)

**Gwar!**

So what would be the best solution to prevent trolls? Should I make an Article with a download link and link the article in my signature?

**augustus5**

Best way to prevent trolls is to not respond to them. A troll that can't get anyone's attention is a very sad little bugger.

I voted to put it back up BTW. Not because I'm interested in it, as I don't play SW anymore, but because this is a forum where we discuss such things and it should have it's place here.

**Arander**

I voted no as personally, I didn't care for the majority of the FAQ. I thought you spent quite a bit of time discussing rules that anyone with the slightest knowledge of the rules would know. Did you actually have people asking whether or not bloodclaws get +2 attacks on the charge? It seemed pretty cut and dry to me in the codex.

If you do reupload it, probably some form of article would be the way to go then. Once uploaded, I'd then stop talking about it. It seems every board here has a topic devoted to your FAQ, with lots of moaning and whining to be had by all. Put it out there, link it to your sig and let that be it. If people ask questions in YMDC, then you can link to it and let people know this is how you feel the ruling should be.

**Gwar!**

Arander wrote:I voted no as personally, I didn't care for the majority of the FAQ. I thought you spent quite a bit of time discussing rules that anyone with the slightest knowledge of the rules would know. Did you actually have people asking whether or not bloodclaws get +2 attacks on the charge? It seemed pretty cut and dry to me in the codex.

Yes, I did. I find it funny you lambaste others knowledge of the rules when you show here that you lack that knowledge. There is no such thing as charging. There is assaulting. Thus, a Rule that gives +2 attacks when you charge does nothing.

In any case, it's re-upped, hosted on Mediafire to avoid any Legal mumbo jumbo.

**Frazzled**

Wait, what? Where did it go? Who are you? Who am I?

Mmmm barbeque I'm better now.

**Frazzled**

Wait, what? Where did it go? Who are you? Who am I?

Mmmm barbeque I'm better now.