Switch Theme:

Opinions on Packaging  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
What Style of Packaging annoys you the least?
Skrinkwrapped Cardboard Box (GW)
Folded Cardboard Box (PP/DP9)
Plastic Clapshell box with slip sleeve (Mantic)
DVD Case (Urban Mammoth)
Plastic Blister (PP/Wyrd)
Cardboard & Plastic Blister (GW)
Plastic Baggie

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






Akron, OH

I'd like to gather some opinions on packaging from both Gamers and Retailers. When dealing with buying and/or stocking miniatures, which packing annoys you the least? Please comment with your preferences, and why.

-Emily Whitehouse| On The Lamb Games
 
   
Made in ca
Feldwebel





Edmonton

Really, I've only bought from GW, and I do enjoy their packaging.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/03/14 21:31:43



 
   
Made in gb
Mutilatin' Mad Dok




Gloucester

Packaging is always going to be a difficult one for miniature companies to get right. You need the balance between making sure the contents stays safe and in a saleable condition without destroying the environment and you profit margins (packaging is normaly the biggest expense for most retailers)

For me GW aren't too bad, they use up all the space possible on their sprues, plastic packaging (box insterts) are kept as thin as possible with out loosing rigidity, the boxes themselves are recyclable being cardboard, and the shrink wrap to keep the boxes undamaged is as thin as you would want to go. The same can be said for their blisters. GW also offer ways of using up excess packaging for making terrain. Clipping down sprues for rubble and using bliter fronts and box inserts for windows or other building features.

I still think more could be done though. Whilst it may not look very nice I would rather the box inserts were made from recycled card board, a bit like the packaging you get in mobile phone boxes.

My pet hate with packaging is vac formed plastic, the sort of stuff GW use for their tools, I am sure there are alternatives. I find this stuff difficult to open and impossible to recycle (with ease). I would rather they put their tools in card boxes or blisters.

Arte et Marte


5000pts
5000pts
4000pts
Ogres: 2000pts
Empire: 6000pts 
   
Made in us
Executing Exarch






Odenton, MD

I would prefer the one with the least amount of plastic and wasted space.
   
Made in gb
Dispassionate Imperial Judge






HATE Club, East London

The GW packaging is generally fine. The biggest improvement I could think off would be removing the parts from the sprue before packaging.

It's not the models that take up all the packaging, it's the fact that they're attached to a rather larger plastic sprue...

   
Made in us
Servoarm Flailing Magos







I never really liked GW's old "Small boxes" with the styrofoam insert. They seemed to have a lot of bent metals in them.

Do they even sell anything in these anymore?

Working on someting you'll either love or hate. Hopefully to be revealed by November.
Play the games that make you happy. 
   
 
Forum Index » Dakka Discussions
Go to: