Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I'm back! And, I'm doing battle reports again! This is part one of a batrep in which we use the Themed Armies from the Cygnar and Khador forces books.

Hey, cool! Welcome back

And here is part two:

Cool battle report, thanks for posting it! I like how detailed it was. Lastly both you guys had great looking painted armies.

Great battle report.

The cygnar tier lists are all a bit over specialized. I think the problem is in the faction, as most of the figs are specialists and combined arms is needed for efficient list. Also the lack of mercs hurts a lot.

Great battle report. The Khador player allowed himself to bet bottled up by terrain, and so his Man-O-Wars accomplished nothing. Perhaps a pincer move would have been more effective, either splitting the Cygnar forces or at least being able to come at them from both sides and hem them in. I am starting to get the impression from these battle reports that one thing WM and 40K have in common is that maneuvering effectively is vital.

I think it's more vital in WM because you actually get an in game advantage for getting behind an enemy as opposed to 40k where you just get lower armor against a vehicle.