Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Hi all,

I have just finished some projects for a client and thought the looked quite cool.

We have some Macedonian Phalangites here ---> http://www.ikonik.net/gw/viewtopic.php?t=835

And secondly a few British Soldiers from 1879 ---> http://www.ikonik.net/gw/viewtopic.php?t=834

Comments more than welcome.

I have to ask: how often do people go on about the
accuracy of historicals? I'm referring to the guy who
mentioned the Macedonian depth.

It is a nice paint job.

From my experience playing Warhammer Ancient Battles (using a borrowed army) and hanging with that crowd, pretty rarely that people nit pick like that. Most rulesets also allow a good bit of lattitude as to how said army is fielded too.

Back on topic, those are awesome! 18mm Macedonians better painted than most can do 28-30mm (like the nit picker)!!! That rocks!

is it me or does the wounded Brit look like he's checking himself for a fever?

is it me or does the wounded Brit look like he's checking himself for a fever?

I agree completely.

I put the blood there just to make it look like her was at least attempting to check the wounds instead of checking for a fever or exclaiming "how bloody hot it is" or some such thing...

It is certainly an odd pose, very OTT dramatic, "woe is me" type stuff.

8)