Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/04 23:00:20
Subject: Imperial Armour Apocalypse in non-Apoc 6e Games
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Hi there,
I'm just wondering if it's generally frowned upon to use rules/units from the Forgeworld Imperial Armour Apocalypse books for non-Apocalypse, specifically the Imperial Guard flyers?
Thanks,
q
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/04 23:03:59
Subject: Imperial Armour Apocalypse in non-Apoc 6e Games
|
 |
Lesser Daemon of Chaos
|
Imperial Aeronautica is okay, but Apocalypse stuff might be pushing it. Unless you're playing a big game, I guess.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/04 23:04:58
Subject: Imperial Armour Apocalypse in non-Apoc 6e Games
|
 |
Perfect Shot Dark Angels Predator Pilot
|
With consent from whoever your playing you can pretty much do whatever you want.
but generally i think apoc is usually reserved for apoc.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/04 23:07:48
Subject: Re:Imperial Armour Apocalypse in non-Apoc 6e Games
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Ah I see. So the Thunderbolt for example is from Aeronautica - had my books and acronyms confused
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/04 23:11:14
Subject: Imperial Armour Apocalypse in non-Apoc 6e Games
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
Perth/Glasgow
|
xSPYXEx wrote:Imperial Aeronautica is okay, but Apocalypse stuff might be pushing it. Unless you're playing a big game, I guess.
aeronautica uses a completely different scale and ruleset
|
Currently debating whether to study for my exams or paint some Deathwing |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/04 23:21:56
Subject: Imperial Armour Apocalypse in non-Apoc 6e Games
|
 |
Lesser Daemon of Chaos
|
Imperial Armor Aeronautica, then. The one that's got the fliers and stuff in it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/04 23:27:21
Subject: Imperial Armour Apocalypse in non-Apoc 6e Games
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
At least the newer FW books have either "Warhammer 40 000" or "Apocalypse" stamps next to the units to tell you in which games the unit is meant to be used.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/05 00:18:55
Subject: Re:Imperial Armour Apocalypse in non-Apoc 6e Games
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
In IAA, the Hyperios Air Defence Battery is listed as a fast attack option for SM armies - should this not be a fortification much like the Aegis?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/05 00:30:16
Subject: Imperial Armour Apocalypse in non-Apoc 6e Games
|
 |
Implacable Skitarii
|
In theory, they work together....but results may very. Some units are just not designed to be balanced against non-apocalypse armies. Talk it out with your opponent(s) before hand.
|
Dangerzone! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/02/05 01:09:43
Subject: Re:Imperial Armour Apocalypse in non-Apoc 6e Games
|
 |
Bane Lord Tartar Sauce
|
As a general rule of thumb, if a unit has "this unit may be taken as an X choice in a Codex: Y army list", then it is good for standard 40k. Some things are more powerful than others, but the imbalance is no worse than that in main 40k (I would argue that the best non-superheavy model in the game for its point cost is the Vendetta). However, superheavy choices and choices that don't have a specified slot in the FOC are too powerful for a normal 40k game.
|
|
 |
 |
|