| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/21 10:11:35
Subject: FMC drake 1850, fun or rude?
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
So I love daemon princes and the randomness of CD. This seems fun, but would someone enjoy playing against it?
CD Primary
Keeper of Secrets, bare
DP slaanesh wings armor Exalted and Greater reward
2x10 daemonettes
3x DP Slaanesh, wings, armor, greater and exalted
CSM ally
DP Slaanesh wings armor
10 cultist 1 flamer
Baledrake
1850
Clearly hoping for Riftbringer, but one will swap for portaglyph. 50% of the greaters will likely become lash for 2d6 S6 shots.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/21 14:48:42
Subject: Re:FMC drake 1850, fun or rude?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Looks like a weaker version of the flying circus build, which is fine for a fluffy type list. I don't think its rude at all.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/21 14:57:44
Subject: FMC drake 1850, fun or rude?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Well its not tzeentch so its not bad. It's going to be difficult and not fun for some of the less imaginative types but for the most part it should be a fairly normal game.
Easiest way to deal with it is kill your troops and systematically kill your princes.
|
Rick Priestley said it best:
Bryan always said that if the studio ever had to mix with the manufacturing and sales part of the business it would destroy the studio. And I have to say – he wasn’t wrong there! The modern studio isn’t a studio in the same way; it isn’t a collection of artists and creatives sharing ideas and driving each other on. It’s become the promotions department of a toy company – things move on!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/21 23:20:48
Subject: FMC drake 1850, fun or rude?
|
 |
Sinister Chaos Marine
Australia
|
Flying circus has always been a trade off of troops for power. It's a tactical based army that focuses on how you use your princes to win. Your army follows the FMC troops<DP's ritual, but is just a little shy.
To me it just lacks a little punch. No mastery level on any of your princes is a little bad. Consider squeezing in some rolls on biomancy looking for iron arm to synergize with lash. >
|
Sanity Is For The Weak |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/22 04:14:51
Subject: FMC drake 1850, fun or rude?
|
 |
Wondering Why the Emperor Left
|
As far as interpret the codex you cannot take a DP of Slaanesh as a HQ if you have a KoS because they become exclusively heavy support choices.
|
Currently not in posession of any armies - I merely theorycraft and discuss background,
Waiting for HH Book 6 so I can start an Imperial Army army. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/12/22 07:46:34
Subject: FMC drake 1850, fun or rude?
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Oooooh I will check into that HQ/Heavy. First time doing this and I just thought it'd be fun to cruise around vector striking  I don't want the circus. Lash and bio could be cool. If I have to ditch a DP due to exclusively heavy then ya I got pts, but I don't want it to become simply slaanesh circus :/ thanks everyone for thoughts and opinions!
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|