Rulebook Classifications

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Co'tor Shas**

This isn't really proposed rules, but proposed classifications to make things easier. This would allow TOs, and just normal players, to better define the games they want.
1. Codexes/Core: The main armies, SM, IG, DE, Eldar, Necrons, Orks, BA, DA, SW, Tau, SoB, Tyranids, CSM, Chaos Daemons, GK.
2. Supplemental Codexes: Codexes in their own right, but not part of the 15, Imperial Knights, Inquisition, Militarum Tempestus ect.
3. Codex Supplements: (Just to be confusing) These are based on a codex, but are no a codex unto themselves, FE, Iyanden, Clan Raukaan, ect.
4. Supplemental Rules: These add rules to the original rulebook, Apocalypse, Escalation, Stronghold Assault, Cites of Death, Planetstrike, Killteam
5. Forgeworld: These would be treated like Codex Supplements unless there is a complete army list in that specific book, elisains, ect.

**Co'tor Shas**

What, nothing?

**BewareOfTom**

I always thought it was already like this :/

**Co'tor Shas**

Not officially, I just think it should be. I'm looking for opinions on what to do better, new classification, mis-classification,ect.

This is mostly in response tow people saying you have to play escalation/stronghold assault. I find that odd because by their logic, you would also have you play cites of death, planetstike, ect.