Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I want to host a small BloodBowl tournament with my friends. Simple stuff:
Every body play 3 games, player with the most victories win all. Total numbers to touchdown break ties.

Then the small questions

Should we play with experience? With death?

On one hand, players death is common in BB, expected, and is a big part of the game.
But on another if you are unlucky during your first game (high number of death), it will affect your other two games...
and your fun.

What to do, what to do...

Typically, Blood Bowl tournaments play 'Resurrection Style', meaning your players will not retain injuries, will not gain SPP, nor will anyone roll for improvements between rounds. You show up at the tournament with a roster, and you play every game with that exact same roster. In my opinion, this is the best approach around for several reasons.

For one, player death, while uncommon, isn't that uncommon. Throw in MNG's and other injuries and that means half of every casualty inflicted should result in a missing player. To make matters worse, every injury a team sustains makes it even more likely they'll sustain further significant injuries later on (since, playing with less players, they are forced to expose/unable to protect important players... Run out of Linemen, and eventually you have to set positionals on the line). Playing in a non-resurrection tournament, most any agility team (Elves, Skaven, etc) would be hard-pressed to make it to game 3 without a healthy number of injured players. Meanwhile, the bashy/high AV teams (Orcs, Dwarves, etc) will still likely be in perfect shape by game 3. This is not so fair.

In short, a non-resurrection tournament is going to be "bash or lose". There's a case to be made for a tournament like that, but the downsides are very hard to ignore. A coach who loses their first game and takes a bunch of casualties in the process is going into their next game with a significant disadvantage. Probably a nearly unwinnable situation, and one which likely will result in even more injuries. And then they've got another game after that? Yeah, sounds like a bad time.

With resurrection style, everyone has a fresh start in their next game. They might have gotten murdered in round 1, but round 2 they get another chance. Keep hope alive, even for the hopeless, and everyone should have a good tournament, even the losers.

Since you mentioned scoring, I'll also suggest you come up with other tiebreakers besides number of TD (since this isn't a great metric of a team's success, and will often still result in a tie). I've seen several different scoring systems/tiebreakers used, but my personal preference is something like:

Win = 3pts, Tie = 1pt, Loss = 0pt
Most points at end of round 3 is the winner.

Tiebreakers:
TD differential (difference in TD scored vs. TD against)
...If TD diff is tied: CAS differential (difference in CAS inflicted vs. CAS sustained)
...If CAS diff is tied: # of TD's
...If # of TD's is tied: # of CAS
...If all that's tied, play rock-paper-scissors. Best of 3.

Anyway, just something more to think about. Good luck! Hope the tournament works out for you.

What do your players think about it?

Also, is this part of an existing league or a one-off event?

Thanks whigwam.

What do your players think about it?
I did not ask them yet. But I will.

Also, is this part of an existing league or a one-off event?
One-off event.

One possibility is to have divisions.

Say you have 8 players.

Divide them up into 2 divisions of 4 teams.

Pot A and Pot B

Have pot A as faster more agagile teams and Pot as the Harder hitting teams. (Roughly depending on teams participating)

Each player plays each other team in his pot once.

Then You take the first placed team in each pot play each other for the final.

2nd place teams face off and so on.

So then you have a clear league result.
Which would hopefully keep faster teams intact, they could still be crippled week 1 but at least that's the will of the dice gods and not because they drew a bashy team and had to break a dwarf cage.