Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

So, I am kinda torn between the two. The Lord-Castellant would allow for another model with a lot of wounds on the field making it easier to run a game with just a couple of models and still make it last more than 15 minutes (Plus, he is the only way to get Gryph-Hounds as of right now). The amount of time put into a game is extremely important to me as there's just not a lot of it. That said, another box of Judicators would allow me to create the Thunderhead Brotherhood Battalion (already have enough Liberators, just need another unit of Judicators).

Just curious which one you'd pick in my situation.

Thanks in advance

SG

Hard to go wrong. If you already have some Judicators, might want to try out the Castellant. He's surprisingly good in close combat I've found. Not sure what the formation does.

Round out your brotherhood with another box of Judicators first. Then when you can spare the cash grab the Castellant.

Incredibly difficult question since both are very good. The Lord-Castellant adds incredible durability to a key unit while the Judicators provide your only ranged support troops. Personally I'd probably go for the judicators first to finish that brotherhood but if you are having issues with the "tankiness" or survivability of your units then the Castellant is the perfect addition