| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2016/07/26 14:06:09
Subject: Stormcast Eternal, what is the better bang for your buck?
|
|
Ultramarine Scout with Sniper Rifle
Bloomington, IN
|
The Start Collecting box or the half of the Age of Sigmar Starter Set?
|
|
|
 |
|
2016/07/26 14:25:09
Subject: Re:Stormcast Eternal, what is the better bang for your buck?
|
|
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Depends, money-wise the start collecting box is probably the better option. Unlike the starter set half, the full kits for liberators and prosecutors are included. You do get more models with the starter set (no options though) and that'll take you farther in matched play.
|
|
|
|
|
2016/07/26 15:32:07
Subject: Stormcast Eternal, what is the better bang for your buck?
|
|
Nasty Nob on a Boar
|
I have seen the starter box going for $70 - so you get more out of it but less options. Our store was getting rid of AoS starters and I grabbed 4 for $200, so I have a massive army. I've just been bitsing my other options.
I would check around. You could always trade the chaos side for more SE stuff.
|
 No madam, 40,000 is the year that this game is set in. Not how much it costs. Though you may have a point. - GW Fulchester
 The Gatling Guns have flamethrowers on them because this is 40k - DOW III
|
|
|
|
|
2016/07/26 15:39:27
Subject: Stormcast Eternal, what is the better bang for your buck?
|
|
Dakka Veteran
|
I'd say the starter set you get a good core of liberators and a unique character (lord relictor) who is a pretty good supporter you have a dracoth boss and winged dudes as well. Over all its a more rounded force. The get started set only gives you 2 retributors and in match play you pay for 5 though the other models (liberators/prosacuters) it seems like all the options. For me its the big start box and if you swap/sell the chaos side you could have a good sized storm army or pay less (after sales) for the box.
|
|
|
|
|
2016/07/26 16:24:38
Subject: Stormcast Eternal, what is the better bang for your buck?
|
|
Pyro Pilot of a Triach Stalker
|
Why not both?
|
01001000 01100001 01101001 01101100 00100000 01101111 01110101 01110010 00100000 01001110 01100101 01100011 01110010 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101111 01110110 01100101 01110010 01101100 01101111 01110010 01100100 01110011 00100001 |
|
|
|
|
2016/07/26 21:58:51
Subject: Stormcast Eternal, what is the better bang for your buck?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Lol I thought stormcast extremis would be the best bang for your buck to get started with AOS....lol ended up spending 1k just on extremis alone
|
|
|
|
|
2016/07/26 22:06:24
Subject: Stormcast Eternal, what is the better bang for your buck?
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
If you're doing Matched Play, the Extremis Chamber lacks any Battleline units.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
|
2016/07/27 07:31:05
Subject: Stormcast Eternal, what is the better bang for your buck?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
 Ghaz wrote:If you're doing Matched Play, the Extremis Chamber lacks any Battleline units.
8 units of 10 skinks...there you go
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
