Switch Theme:

GW Facebook FAQ guys incompetent?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Fresh-Faced New User





So I'm looking over the Imperial Guard FAQ that just came out on the Facebook page and it was really half-a$$ed and incomplete. Also there was a real opportunity for them to clean up some codex mistakes such as Yarrick not having stubborn like every other commissar, or hydras having interceptor.

It's not just the Guard FAQ either. Looking back at the other FAQs is really making my blood boil. Like why does my super heavy tank have to nominate all 9 of its different weapons before it fires!? And if a target got destroyed then other shots on that target get wasted...NOBODY wants to play their Baneblade like that!

The one grenade thing? Like is that not perfect proof that the people designing the rules don't actually play 40k. Who on this earth were using grenades like that in CC? I mean, there are many codexes that were designed so that every model could use a grenade in CC such as the demolitions upgrade to IG veterans.

Where do they hire these guys? Shouldn't you at least have to play the game to design rules for it?!
   
Made in us
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth






Shadeglass Maze

Please don't start a thread on such an inflammatory note...
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: