| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/01 05:50:42
Subject: Krios Venator - Volkite Sentinels
|
 |
Humorless Arbite
|
Hi there, just a little bit of a query on rules interaction between the Volkite Sentinels and the Krios Venator's Pulsar-Fusil.
The conflicting rules:
1. The Pulsar-Fusil is Ordnance and so going by the BRB, the Volkite Sentinels MUST snap shot.
2. Then there's a little wording on the Volkite Sentinels - 'Each is a pintle mounted Volkite Charger which can be fired in addition to any other weapons the vehicle is carrying without penalty and may target units separately from the vehicles main armament.'
So do they have to snap shot or can they fire normally?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/01 06:24:49
Subject: Krios Venator - Volkite Sentinels
|
 |
Cog in the Machine
|
Just like in 40k where codex rules take precedence over BRB rules, the same applies here. You can fire the volkite at full BS and at another target if desired.
|
"Blessed is the mind too small for doubt"
4,000pts
3,500pts
2,500pts
2,000pts |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/01 10:22:43
Subject: Krios Venator - Volkite Sentinels
|
 |
Stalwart Tribune
|
They fire normal, like on the Triaros.
|
30k: Taghmata Omnissiah(5,5k)
Ordo Reductor(4,5k)
Legio Cybernetica(WIP)
40k(Inactive): Adeptus Mechanicus(2,5k)
WFB(Inactive): Nippon, Skaven
01001111 01110010 01100100 01101111 00100000 01010010 01100101 01100100 01110101 01100011 01110100 01101111 01110010 00100001 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/01 12:52:14
Subject: Krios Venator - Volkite Sentinels
|
 |
Did Fulgrim Just Behead Ferrus?
|
They're like little PotMS guns. I just never waste the points on them, though.
|
"Through the darkness of future past, the magician longs to see.
One chants out between two worlds: Fire, walk with me." - Twin Peaks
"You listen to me. While I will admit to a certain cynicism, the fact is that I am a naysayer and hatchetman in the fight against violence. I pride myself in taking a punch and I'll gladly take another because I choose to live my life in the company of Gandhi and King. My concerns are global. I reject absolutely revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method... is love. I love you Sheriff Truman." - Twin Peaks |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/09/01 13:11:04
Subject: Krios Venator - Volkite Sentinels
|
 |
Stalwart Tribune
|
|
30k: Taghmata Omnissiah(5,5k)
Ordo Reductor(4,5k)
Legio Cybernetica(WIP)
40k(Inactive): Adeptus Mechanicus(2,5k)
WFB(Inactive): Nippon, Skaven
01001111 01110010 01100100 01101111 00100000 01010010 01100101 01100100 01110101 01100011 01110100 01101111 01110010 00100001 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2616/09/01 14:53:16
Subject: Krios Venator - Volkite Sentinels
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Otto Weston wrote:Hi there, just a little bit of a query on rules interaction between the Volkite Sentinels and the Krios Venator's Pulsar-Fusil.
The conflicting rules:
1. The Pulsar-Fusil is Ordnance and so going by the BRB, the Volkite Sentinels MUST snap shot.
2. Then there's a little wording on the Volkite Sentinels - 'Each is a pintle mounted Volkite Charger which can be fired in addition to any other weapons the vehicle is carrying without penalty and may target units separately from the vehicles main armament.'
So do they have to snap shot or can they fire normally?
Thanks
The wording in point 2 clearly explains it.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|