| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/10/29 01:31:47
Subject: Leviathan force org and Gahlan Surlak
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Can a primarch be chosen in a leviathan force org with imperial knights? Just the primarch?
Also, can Gahlan Surlak be chosen as a compulsory HQ in an allied detachment?
He is a support officer, but it says "may not be a compulsory hq if chosen in a primary detachment"
I want to take knights with a 20 man tac angron and 10 red butchers. Is this possible?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/10/29 02:30:08
Subject: Leviathan force org and Gahlan Surlak
|
 |
[ARTICLE MOD]
Huge Hierodule
|
I would say no. The allied chart doesn't allow a Lord of War and the allied HQ has to be a compulsory
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/10/29 07:47:07
Subject: Leviathan force org and Gahlan Surlak
|
 |
Member of a Lodge? I Can't Say
Oromocto, NB, Canada
|
I never noticed it said he was a support officer.
|
Mat
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/10/29 08:22:25
Subject: Leviathan force org and Gahlan Surlak
|
 |
Battleship Captain
|
As long as it's imperial knights, does it ned to be a leviathan detachment? An Imperial knights primary detachment, with a primarchs chosen allied detachment should do most of what you want.
|
Termagants expended for the Hive Mind: ~2835
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/10/29 13:57:07
Subject: Re:Leviathan force org and Gahlan Surlak
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Isn't primarchs chosen a primary? Wouldn't angron have to be my warlord? can I takr both?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/10/29 14:50:45
Subject: Leviathan force org and Gahlan Surlak
|
 |
[ARTICLE MOD]
Huge Hierodule
|
The allied contingent only allows for a single low, if i reca . You wanted to run multiple knights
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/10/29 15:16:48
Subject: Leviathan force org and Gahlan Surlak
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
None of what you listed can be taken in a Leviathan detachment. The Compulsory LoW for the Leviathan detachment must be either an Engine of Destruction (a vehicle with 9 or more Hull Points) or a Great Beast (a gargantuan creature with 9 or more wounds). Neither a Primarch nor any variant of Imperial Knight fit those criteria. The best way to run World Eaters with Knights is use the Questoris Knight Crusade Army List allied to a World Eaters Primary AoD (or RoW) that allows a Lord of War slot for Angron who would then be the Warlord. As for your second question: Absolutely yes. Gahlan Surlak can certainly be the compulsory HQ in an allied detachment, because an Allied Detachment is not the same thing as a Primary Detachment and the wording specifically calls out only Primary Detachments.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/10/29 15:22:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|