Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2017/12/12 21:41:59
Subject: LoWs in Supreme Command Detachments?
|
|
Monstrously Massive Big Mutant
|
Just so you can save yourself looking in the book itself, a Supreme Command Detachment gives 1 CP, and requires 3 HQ choices, with a maximum of 5. Additionally, you can optionally field 1 elite and 1 lord of war.
I get the Elite slot to some degree, it allows you to field a bodyguard of the same faction for your HQs...But why the Lord of War? What benefit is there to having the Lord of War inside the detachment?
|
|
|
|
2017/12/12 21:48:18
Subject: LoWs in Supreme Command Detachments?
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
Roboute Guilliman, Magnus the Red and Mortarion are all Lords of War.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2017/12/12 21:58:51
Subject: LoWs in Supreme Command Detachments?
|
|
Storm Trooper with Maglight
|
Guard Baneblade with doctrines without taking 3.
|
|
|
|
|
2017/12/12 22:02:40
Subject: LoWs in Supreme Command Detachments?
|
|
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
Ghaz wrote:Roboute Guilliman, Magnus the Red and Mortarion are all Lords of War.
Yes those are common choices but would game be better or worse if those couldn't be taken so easily AND spam psykers AND get commnad points all at once...
|
2024 painted/bought: 109/109 |
|
|
|
2017/12/12 22:10:56
Subject: LoWs in Supreme Command Detachments?
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
Yet that's why the Lord of War slot is there. Would it really be a Supreme Command detachment if you couldn't take your Supreme Commander because he's a Lord of War?
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
2017/12/12 22:15:48
Subject: LoWs in Supreme Command Detachments?
|
|
Monstrously Massive Big Mutant
|
Ghaz wrote:Yet that's why the Lord of War slot is there. Would it really be a Supreme Command detachment if you couldn't take your Supreme Commander because he's a Lord of War?
OOOH I get what you mean now. The fluffy point of it is that the Lord of War can be taken as your "supreme commander", with the 3 HQs underneath him....GOOOTCHA, makes sense now.
|
|
|
|
|